• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Rearranging shareholdings

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Paralytic View Post
    Just because they didn't post back doesn't mean it didn't work for them! Maybe they're all larging it up in the Seychelles with their millions and have no need to post here any more.

    Maybe.
    This is true although we have had feedback from a few where it fell apart. So that's a couple of failures, a couple of silences and not one post to say it worked well for them. Not cast in stone but is evidence of a trend of what people generally think anyway.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #32
      The question is still whether there is any real value in the company. If there are no retained funds, is there a product? If not, then the profit is coming from the personal services of the directors, presumably, in which case it wouldn't be hard to argue that the company itself has no real value.

      If there's a product, there's value. Then you get into employment related shares, as Martin has said, and it gets complex.

      Comment

      Working...
      X