• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

MVL - entrepreneurs relief and starting new LTD Company

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Time for General...

    Comment


      #22
      Clearly going via an Umbrella company is not the most tax efficient way of contracting, but it might be the best of both world for two years.

      People also keep forgetting that, if your situation changes, you have options. One of them being that if you decide to open an LTD again, you can inform HMRC and pay the income tax that you should've paid when you liquidated.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by bcontractor View Post
        Clearly going via an Umbrella company is not the most tax efficient way of contracting, but it might be the best of both world for two years.

        People also keep forgetting that, if your situation changes, you have options. One of them being that if you decide to open an LTD again, you can inform HMRC and pay the income tax that you should've paid when you liquidated.

        What income tax?? Could you please be clear. A little information is far worse than no information

        The worse case scenario the way I understand it is the difference between paying 10% ER tax on gains, or the worse option of paying 20% GCT if you started trading within 2 years.

        Not having a dig at you, however definitely there are a few people on these threads that pass on a lot of nonsense as fact and the tone is somewhat aggressive supported by bitterness.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by luxCon View Post
          there are a few people on these threads that pass on a lot of nonsense .....

          Exhibit A.....

          Originally posted by luxCon View Post
          Northernlad, you seem to know everything. What if I collected all the invoices, and sent them all a day after the 2 years?? Wil that do the trick?
          Exhibit B... (well spotted JB I missed that)
          Originally posted by luxCon View Post
          The worse case scenario the way I understand it is the difference between paying 10% ER tax on gains, or the worse option of paying 20% GCT if you started trading within 2 years.
          Last edited by Lance; 15 January 2021, 10:23.
          See You Next Tuesday

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by luxCon View Post
            The worse case scenario the way I understand it is the difference between paying 10% ER tax on gains, or the worse option of paying 20% GCT if you started trading within 2 years.
            Stop opining on stuff that you know nothing about.

            The TAAR has nothing to do with ER, it is part of the TiS legislation and concerns the capital treatment of specified transactions. The ER is completely separate and is part of your SATR. So you will not default to CGT of 20% in the event that the TAAR is not met because there will be no capital treatment.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by luxCon View Post
              What income tax?? Could you please be clear. A little information is far worse than no information

              The worse case scenario the way I understand it is the difference between paying 10% ER tax on gains, or the worse option of paying 20% GCT if you started trading within 2 years.

              Not having a dig at you, however definitely there are a few people on these threads that pass on a lot of nonsense as fact and the tone is somewhat aggressive supported by bitterness.
              I have spoken to my accountant and various liquidators. Every single one has said the following: if you go for MVL and pay CG (at 10% if eligible, 20% if not) because you are planning to not start trading within 2 years, but subsequently your circumstances change and you decide that you want to trade again in a similar trade, you can inform HMRC and pay the additional liability, which would be the difference between the CG you paid and the tax you would've paid if the distributions had been treated as dividends.

              If you don't inform HMRC (with all the ethical implications of not doing so), they might contact you, at which stage you will have to go through an investigation. If TAAR applies, they'll want the different in liability + interest + penalties (which can be substantial).

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Lance View Post
                Exhibit A.....
                If we're going to start exhibiting evidence against luxCon, we might want to switch to a numbering scheme...

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Lance View Post
                  Exhibit A.....



                  Exhibit B... (well spotted JB I missed that)
                  As with Exhibit A it was said in jest but clearly the gel in some contributor's head is set too hard to get it


                  As for B, I am happy to be corrected and the forum to become source of Facts rather than assumptions. Why dont you correct any misinformation with valid reference to external sources rather than attack

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by luxCon View Post
                    As with Exhibit A it was said in jest but clearly the gel in some contributor's head is set too hard to get it


                    As for B, I am happy to be corrected and the forum to become source of Facts rather than assumptions. Why dont you correct any misinformation with valid reference to external sources rather than attack
                    for it to be understood to be in jest there needs to be some credibility earned. At the moment your credibility is pretty low so stupid ideas look like stupid ideas rather than jokes.

                    As for reference. Jamesbrown corrected you quite correctly. It's quite hard to reference the fact that TAAR is not related to ER as it's not related. One is a rule on what you can do after a capital distribution. The other is a personal tax relief on capital gains. You might argue they are related to capital, but TAAR has no bearing on ER and ER has no bearing on TAAR.
                    See You Next Tuesday

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
                      Stop opining on stuff that you know nothing about.
                      Yeah because that's my job and I'm ****ing good at it.
                      'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X