• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Accountant Problems

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    We are now off-topic from the original post guys.
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by Nixon Williams View Post
      You would still be able to claim Corporation tax relief, so it is still worth doing.
      Agree with Prozak and ASB. You're going to have to explain that one to us lay people....
      Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by KittyCat View Post
        But I would have had to pay income tax & NI & employers NI as I had already earned over 7K & would have to do payroll based on figs from my P45? so I would have paid more tax - income tax & NI.
        Absolutely, but that's not clear from your original post where you said:

        Originally posted by KittyCat View Post
        The last couple of years I've just taken all dividends!
        which lead people to (not unreasonably) presume that you had no other income (including salary from another job) and your only income was dividends. Earning a salary with PAYE while running a LTD company does complicate things somewhat. It's probably worth getting an accountant to review all your personal circumstances and advise you what to do. We can only give general advice and that's going to be wrong if we don't have the full details which you couldn't be expected to discuss here...
        Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by cojak View Post
          We are now off-topic from the original post guys.
          Thread evolution Cojak.

          We are complex folks here

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by prozak View Post
            Thread evolution Cojak.

            We are complex folks here
            Fine,

            You deal with the threads, I'll deal with the trolls.
            "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
            - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by cojak View Post
              Fine,

              You deal with the threads, I'll deal with the trolls.
              That'd be nice. Half the threads here seem to be people insulting each other and chatting about random stuff this week.
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by prozak View Post
                Whoa!

                you're gonna have to justify that one Alan.

                Anything Kitty now earns is taxed at 20% personal (assuming she is still under the higher tax rate) - negating the CT benefit, essentially just passing the tax to her personal tax band.

                Plus she pays 12% NI.
                Plus there is 13.8% Employers NI.

                Plus every pound she earns means 25% to be paid on the dividends she has already taken (she has already said she is over the higher tax rate due to dividends i think)


                Or am I wrong?

                By all means please prove me wrong. I am no expert.
                Yeh. Agree with Prozak here.
                Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by psychocandy View Post
                  Yeh. Agree with Prozak here.
                  NI is calculated on a weekly basis per employment, it's not like tax which works on a coding basis. Therefore you can earn £7,000 in different employments and not pay NI or Er NI on either. You'd pay tax, but that would be offset by CT. If you're looking backwards, then you could have saved CT at 21% whilst paying income tax at 20%. 1% saving in tax on £7k.
                  ContractorUK Best Forum Adviser 2013

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by prozak View Post
                    Whoa!

                    you're gonna have to justify that one Alan.

                    Anything Kitty now earns is taxed at 20% personal (assuming she is still under the higher tax rate) - negating the CT benefit, essentially just passing the tax to her personal tax band.

                    Plus she pays 12% NI.
                    Plus there is 13.8% Employers NI.

                    Plus every pound she earns means 25% to be paid on the dividends she has already taken (she has already said she is over the higher tax rate due to dividends i think)


                    Or am I wrong?

                    By all means please prove me wrong. I am no expert.
                    Firstly, no NIC (either employees or employers) would be due on an annual salary of £7000 - the National Insurance bands are per 'employment' not per person. So you could have five jobs, each paying a salary of £7000, giving a total income of £35,000 and you would not pay any NIC.

                    If the person was a higher rate taxpayer (and already used their tax allowance), then there would be no difference at all on the total tax paid, as the example below illustrates:

                    Fee income of £50,000 and ignore all expenses, VAT etc.

                    Taking a salary of £7,000 would leave profits of £43,000, meaning corporation tax of £8,600 would be due. Assuming that the remaining profit of £34,400 is paid as a dividend, this would give a total income of £41,400 (34,400 + 7,000).

                    From this income you would be liable for 40% tax on the salary (£2,800) and 25% tax on the dividend (£8,600), so the total tax would be £11,400.

                    So your net income would be £30,000 (£41,400 - £11,400).

                    If NO salary was taken, then the corporation tax would be £10,000 - leaving a dividend of £40,000 that could be paid, the tax on this would be £10,000, so again leaving a net income of £30,000

                    The arguement for a salary on this basis was marginally better when the corporation tax rate was 21%, but the effect of this is now almost gone as most companies will now be fully paying corporation tax at 20% on their profits.

                    However, on top on this, the extra salary will earn additional 'credits' towards the state second pension, probably not a lot but every little helps as a large supermarket states!

                    I hope this explains.

                    Alan

                    Comment


                      #70
                      For what it's worth, I'm also one connection away from Julie on LI, via an agent.

                      <creepy>very cute</creepy>

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X