bandwidth madness

[scooterscot]

What if a single copper wire could maintain multiple channels without compromising Ohms law? By that I mean the bandwidth of each channel would be currently equal to the material's physical limit as is used in current CAT6 cable.

What if I could show you a way to use the same cable but carry 500 times more information, would it be worth something to you laddy?

Stay tuned... if me math works, the next step is to submit a paper to the IEEE journal for peer review, which last cost me £1500

[scooterscot]

Nurse! Nurse!

Electric fields are so yesterday.

[tractor]

...

What if a single copper wire could maintain multiple channels without comprising Ohms law? By that I mean the bandwidth of each channel would be currently equal to the material's physical limit as is used in current CAT6 cable.

What if I could show you a way to use the same cable but carry 500 times more information, would it be worth something to you laddy?

Stay tuned... if me math works, the next step is to submit a paper to the IEEE journal for peer review, which last cost me £1500

Sky told me that and when I signed up, they piggy backed me onto the BT network and I got 275mb/s because I am 4.5k from the exchange.

[Tasslehoff]

What if a single copper wire could maintain multiple channels without compromising Ohms law? By that I mean the bandwidth of each channel would be currently equal to the material's physical limit as is used in current CAT6 cable.

What if I could show you a way to use the same cable but carry 500 times more information, would it be worth something to you laddy?

Stay tuned... if me math works, the next step is to submit a paper to the IEEE journal for peer review, which last cost me £1500

Instead of using 1,0 use 1,0,2. <taps nose>