How do you reconcile the two competing facts:
1. A fully frictionless market yields no particular competitive advantage nor a local monopoly to any particular player.
2. The project is about making the system more efficient (frictionless) so that the company has lower TCO.
I think I am getting a little more insane as days go by - I am told to optimise and deliver, but if I deliver too well I get criticised for creating a market that is too competitive where the org has no upper hand.
In other words make it a little more efficient, just not too efficient.
1. A fully frictionless market yields no particular competitive advantage nor a local monopoly to any particular player.
2. The project is about making the system more efficient (frictionless) so that the company has lower TCO.
I think I am getting a little more insane as days go by - I am told to optimise and deliver, but if I deliver too well I get criticised for creating a market that is too competitive where the org has no upper hand.
In other words make it a little more efficient, just not too efficient.
Comment