• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

That'll learn her

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    That'll learn her

    Dilrushi Mendis blackmailed her former boss Nihal Seneviratne after affair | Daily Mail Online


    Scorned secretary blackmailed her former boss after they had an affair by demanding £200,000 to drop false rape claim she made against him
    Dilrushi Mendis claimed she was raped by businessman Nihal Seneviratne
    40-year-old blackmailed ex-boss after he ended their affair and sacked her
    She demanded £200,000 from him in return for dropping false rape claims
    Mother-of-one handed a suspended prison sentence for blackmail charge
    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

    #2

    Comment


      #3
      suspended sentence

      for ****s sake you can get away with anything if you have tits!

      The sentencing guidelines say up to 14 years for blackmail. Look at their case studies!

      R v Telford [1992] 13 Cr. App. R. (S) 676
      Pleaded guilty to blackmail. The defendant wrote to sweet manufactures and threatened to contaminate there products unless they paid him £1m. 8 years.

      R v Darling [1994] 15 Cr. App. R. (S) 855
      Pleaded guilty to blackmail. The appellant wrote to a hotel, threatening to carry out attacks on guests and staff of the hotel and to publicise the connection with the hotel, unless he was paid £120,000. 5 years.

      R v Hoey and Sherwood [1992] 13 Cr. App. R. (S) 177
      Convicted of blackmail. The defendants were concerned in attempting to persuade the staff of a public house to pay protection money, under threats to damage the premises. Amateurish protection racket. 3 years.
      Unless you're the lead dog, the scenery never changes.

      Currently 10+ contracts available in your area

      Comment


        #4
        She should get 5 years for a fake rape claim straight off the bat.
        I'm a smug bastard.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by LucidDementia View Post
          She should get 5 years for a fake rape claim straight off the bat.
          Dude, don't forget she also got

          80 hours community service work.


          same mutual friend acted as a go-between, communicating Mendis would drop the case for £200,000.
          Some friend, almost sounds like an agent, wonder what their cut was.
          The Chunt of Chunts.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by NibblyPig View Post
            suspended sentence

            for ****s sake you can get away with anything if you have tits!

            The sentencing guidelines say up to 14 years for blackmail. Look at their case studies!

            R v Telford [1992] 13 Cr. App. R. (S) 676
            Pleaded guilty to blackmail. The defendant wrote to sweet manufactures and threatened to contaminate there products unless they paid him £1m. 8 years.

            R v Darling [1994] 15 Cr. App. R. (S) 855
            Pleaded guilty to blackmail. The appellant wrote to a hotel, threatening to carry out attacks on guests and staff of the hotel and to publicise the connection with the hotel, unless he was paid £120,000. 5 years.

            R v Hoey and Sherwood [1992] 13 Cr. App. R. (S) 177
            Convicted of blackmail. The defendants were concerned in attempting to persuade the staff of a public house to pay protection money, under threats to damage the premises. Amateurish protection racket. 3 years.
            So transexuals should get a stiff sentence (fnar fnar) for blackmail if tits is the only requirement
            Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

            No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

            Comment


              #7
              DA would have got at least £1m....

              Comment

              Working...
              X