• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Ok, who was it

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ok, who was it

    Revealed: divorce software error to hit thousands of settlements

    Tens of thousands of couples who have settled their divorces in the last 20 months may have to re-open negotiations because a critical fault has been found in software used to calculate financial terms.

    The Ministry of Justice was urgently investigating the extent of the errors of “Form E” on its website which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband. It has published an email address – [email protected] – asking anyone who believes they have been affected to contact the department.

    The fact the software had been miscalculating assets since April 2014 was only spotted earlier this month by a family law specialist, Nicola Matheson-Durrant of the Family Law Clinic in Ascot, Berkshire. The MoJ only publicly admitted the problem on Thursday.

    Matheson-Durrant told the Guardian: “Having discovered the fault and advised the MoJ, it became apparent that not a single solicitor, barrister or judge in the whole of the UK had noticed this error. It is such a critical fault. This form has been used in training so it will also have been seen by paralegals, university law departments and the Law Society.”

    Matheson-Durrant is not a legally qualified solicitor or barrister, but is a McKenzie Friend, a lay expert who helps litigants. "

    More from the source: Revealed: divorce software error to hit thousands of settlements | Law | The Guardian

    #2
    ...which have the potential to inflate the financial worth of a wife or husband
    Who would be so stupid as to inflate their financial worth.....?

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
      Who would be so stupid as to inflate their financial worth.....?
      Nobody, so they (husband) inflated their debts but ze komputer failed to take those into account properly it appears...

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
        Who would be so stupid as to inflate their financial worth.....?
        I think it's the background calculations are making someone appear as if they are richer than they really are.

        So either they are having to cough up more than they really should (if they are the richer spouse)
        Or they did not receive enough (if they are the poorer spouse - and the error did not affect the other spouse).

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
          Who would be so stupid as to inflate their financial worth.....?
          Donald J Trump for one.
          I'm a smug bastard.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by LucidDementia View Post
            Donald J Trump for one.
            I think in that case, it's the MSM that is the sucker.

            Comment


              #7
              So we are looking for a contractor who knows about divorce?

              No-one round here then...

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by AtW View Post
                Matheson-Durrant is not a legally qualified solicitor or barrister, but is a McKenzie Friend, a lay expert who helps litigants. "
                Proves how cr4p lawyers are.

                Comment


                  #9
                  I vastly over estimated my first wifes assets, then I found out she had been stuffing tissues into her bra.

                  She wasn't laughing so much when she found that sock in me undies


                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I heard MrMarkyMark was responsible for the development and testing. Oh dear.
                    I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X