• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Government gets another spanking in the Lords.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Government gets another spanking in the Lords.

    This time over trying to redefine Child Poverty measurements without actually including house hold income as a measure.

    Government loses major House of Lords vote to redefine child poverty | UK Politics | News | The Independent

    The Government has suffered a major defeat in the House of Lords over its plans to change the way that child poverty is measured.

    Peers voted 290 to 192 in favour of an amendment to that will force the Government to publish annual figures on income-related child poverty.

    Ministers had wanted to scrap income-related measures and replace them with other indicators, including the numbers of children living in workless households.

    The plans were opposed by child poverty charities, and have been challenged by the respected social mobility commission, chaired by former Labour minister Alan Milburn, which said last month that it was “not credible” to tackle child poverty without acknowledging “the most obvious symptom of poverty, lack of money”.
    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

    #2
    Odd isn't it how 'Workless' = 'Poverty'.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
      Odd isn't it how 'Workless' = 'Poverty'.
      Indeed. Lets increase benefits to £1000 a day and fix the issue. Its what bankers get so why not the other feckless.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by NigelJK View Post
        Odd isn't it how 'Workless' = 'Poverty'.
        Is it odd?

        Is it really odd that lazy workshy fecks who do not get out of bed before midday have less money than those who are at work at 8?

        Not really sure that's odd?

        Comment


          #5
          Yes because people out of work are all lazy, shiftless bastards. The distance between your bed and sleeping rough on the streets isn't as big as you'd like to think unless you have a robust welfare state or are independently wealthy. But by all means do the monkey dance and follow America's lead...

          Comment


            #6
            Just had the 'Tax summary' for the wife. The portion on 'Welfare' was about the same as that for 'NHS'. Wonder what the overlap is. Wonder if working makes you fitter so you don't need the NHS part as much.

            Comment


              #7
              The cheeky sods, normally members of the Lords have to pay for a good spanking
              Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

              No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

              Comment

              Working...
              X