• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Secret green tax blitz planned for cars, air travel and consumer goods

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Secret green tax blitz planned for cars, air travel and consumer goods

    Secret green tax blitz planned for cars, air travel and consumer goods
    By SIMON WALTERS, Mail on Sunday Last updated at 22:28pm on 28th October 2006

    Photo: Driving up costs: Gordon Brown getting out of a 4x4

    Secret plans for a multi-billion-pound package of stealth taxes on fuel, cars, air travel and consumer goods have been drawn up by the government to combat global warming.

    The proposals, leaked to The Mail on Sunday, show that the Government is considering introducing a raft of hard-hitting 'eco-taxes' that will have a devastating effect on the cost of living.

    Families with big cars could end up paying more than £1,000 a year extra in tax. And nearly every household in Britain will be hit in the pocket.

    Most controversial of all, the documents reveal the Government is planning to grab billions of pounds of extra revenue from motorists - without telling them. It is considering introducing a special mechanism so that whenever oil prices go down, the Government would get the cash in extra fuel tax - not the motorist. (AtW's comment: nice one!)

    A leaked letter from Environment Secretary David Miliband to Chancellor Gordon Brown says the advantage of this is that the Government would gain billions of pounds 'without individual announcements on fuel-duty rises needing to be made'.

    The Government was immediately accused by the Conservatives of trying to introduce more 'stealth taxes' and failing to be honest with voters about the consequences of dealing with climate change.

    The leak comes 24 hours before Tony Blair launches a major report warning that floods and other natural disasters caused by global warming will spark an economic catastrophe worse than the 1929 Wall Street Crash. But the report, by economist Sir Nicholas Stern, does not reveal what the Government plans to do about it.

    But a leaked letter written from Mr Miliband to Mr Brown on October 18 and obtained by The Mail on Sunday spells out the grim reality: wide-ranging tax rises that will have a dramatic impact on family incomes.

    Mr Miliband calls for tough measures to combat 'car use and ownership' with a 'substantial increase' in road tax, which currently costs a maximum of £210 a year. Mr Miliband says road tax should copy the 'success' of company-car taxes which forced people to switch to smaller vehicles with annual levies of up to £5,000.

    He also suggests a 'Treasury mechanism' allowing the Government to benefit from any fall in oil prices and reintroducing the 'fuel-duty escalator', which put up the duty on petrol by five per cent over inflation until Mr Brown ordered a freeze in 1999.

    Mr Miliband calls for a new 'pay-per-mile pollution tax' on motorists. And he urges VAT on air travel to EU destinations and new taxes on inefficient washing machines and light bulbs.

    He also backs fresh laws to let town halls impose a 'rubbish tax' on households by using 'spies' placed in dustbins to weigh non-recyclable refuse.

    The letter says: 'Differential charging for waste at household level can have a significant role to play and local authorities should be given the powers to do so.'

    Mr Miliband also called for landfill tax - paid by businesses and local councils that bury rubbish - to be increased from £21 a ton to £75. But one environmental expert said this could lead to more fly-tipping unless it is properly policed.

    The letter to Mr Brown, marked 'Restricted', demands urgent and radical action in next month's public-spending review and next year's Budget.

    Changing people's behaviour can be achieved only by 'market forces and price signals', it says, adding: 'Market-based instruments, including taxes, need to play a substantial role. As our understandings of climate change increases, it is clear more needs to be done.'

    The Government must 'increase the pace of existing tax measures, broaden them into sectors where incentives to cut carbon emissions are weak and identify new instruments to drive progress in tackling greenhouse gas'.

    An aide to Mr Miliband said: "We don't comment on leaked documents. These are ideas, not a package of measures." An ally of Mr Brown added: "The Chancellor does not approve of conducting Government business on the basis of leaks."

    Tory environment spokesman Peter Ainsworth said: "No one is more committed to tackling climate change than the Conservatives. But if the Government wants to deal with it successfully, it must do so in an upfront way instead of bringing in stealth taxes by the back door.

    "As with everything this Government does, the devil is in the detail. If motorists and consumers think all the Government wants to do is to slap taxes on everything, they may respond negatively.

    "Tony Blair's Government has sat on its hands for ten years. Tackling the enormous challenge of climate change would have been much easier if they hadn't left it so late."

    Professor Julian Morris, environmental economist at Birmingham University and director of the International Policy Network, a free-market think-tank, called the new taxes "underhand" and accused the Government of "nannying".

    Here we reveal the taxes proposed by Mr Miliband, Professor Morris's opinion of them - and, crucially, what they will cost taxpayers.

    A couple with two children and a big car could see their annual bills increase by about £1,300 a year if the new 'green' stealth taxes go ahead. Even people with average cars could be £750 a year worse off.

    The Miliband memo gives few details on the level of the new taxes. But The Mail on Sunday has compiled a budget - using cautious estimates - showing how families could be hit, based on conversations with Government insiders:

    Chelsea tractor tax: Road tax disc on Toyota Landcruiser trebled from £210 to £630 and doubled from £150 to £300 for Vauxhall Zafira.

    Petrol-will-never-be-cheap tax: The new Treasury plan to raise fuel tax when oil prices drop could raise pump prices by 5p a litre (22p a gallon).

    A family with a gas-guzzling car who drive 15,000 miles a year would face an extra £130 annual petrol bill. A return to automatic annual fuel duty rises at five per cent above inflation could add a further 5p per litre, doubling the additional cost to £260 for a 4x4, £130 for an average car.

    Pay-as-you-drive tax: New tax to make motorists pay for all environmental damage including carbon emissions, congestion, noise and damage to the ozone layer could mean a 2p-per-mile tax on all journeys for big cars, costing £300 on 15,000 annual mileage and £150 (1p a mile) for average vehicles.

    Cheap flights tax: VAT at 17.5 per cent on EU airline flights would increase the typical £500 bill for family of four to fly on holiday to the Mediterranean to £587.50. An extra £5 air passenger duty each would add extra £40. Total extra: £127.50.

    Light bulb tax: New levy on energy-wasting appliances could mean £50 tax on cheap washing machines, dishwashers and tumble-dryers. New £1.50 tax on old-fashioned light bulbs to halve the price gap with energy-saving ones. Total extra cost £56. (Based on an average of one new appliance a year plus four light bulbs.)

    Total extra cost: A family of four with a large car would therefore pay an extra £420 in road tax, £260 in fuel duty, £300 pollution tax, £127.50 aviation tax, and £56 on washing machines and light bulbs, making a grand total of £1,163.50.

    Extra revenue for the Treasury: Up to £7billion.

    ------------------

    Ok, so they get more taxes in order to save the environment - would they invest these taxes into R&D to replace engines that run on fossial fuelds? If they did put £7 bln a year into it then some serious results would have been achieved within a decade, if not less.

    #2
    Green taxes - what a great piece of spin.

    NewLie must just love global warming. Great excuse to put everyones taxes up, and then blame us for causing the problem in the first place. I bet they wish they'd invented global warming years ago.
    His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

    Comment


      #3
      Global warming is a myth. Much the same as oil is a finite resource, many 'old' wells are actually producing more oil now than at their 'peak'. The whole thing is just an enormous con trick on the consumers to pay more for stuff that should be getting cheaper.

      threaded in "Lies, damned lies and statistics" mode
      Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
      threadeds website, and here's my blog.

      Comment


        #4
        Secret green tax blitz planned for cars, air travel and consumer goods

        About time !
        For a start car tax should double for all cars that use petrol, then double the next year and then double the following year.

        There is far too much packaging on everything and air travel prices compared to train travel prices are crazy.
        Last edited by s2budd; 29 October 2006, 16:38.

        Comment


          #5
          OMG we have a problem...quick, lets tax it!

          Well I guess this really is the only way the Government knows how to tackle problems isnt it.

          Is there any surprise then that councils are starting to adopt the same approach? And lets all be honest here, this is blatant revenue collection and nothing more.

          Then again, it is only fair!

          Mailman

          Comment


            #6
            Gloable Shafting

            This puppy has so many holes its probably a cheese.

            1. Has there ever been a report on global warming that doesn't include the words 'could', 'might' or 'may'?

            2. Global warming is just too convienent to be true, it allows the politicians to fleece us in taxes, gives many many scientists lots of cash and offers an amazing opportunity to town hall NAZI's to attack all their pet hate communities i.e. honest law abiding citizens (that make more money than them)

            3. The only precise figures available are how much they're going to tax us, where are the precise reliable figures / predictions for what is actually going to happen and how they will spend the proceeds of the green extortion to prevent it?

            4. Question the orthodoxy of global warming and you won't get answers to your questions just vilification on a par with racists and kiddie fiddlers.

            5. So we're gonna be flooded! So where was all the water kept ready to flood us? If its the poles then my glass of iced wine offers some hope? Displacement etc.

            6. How much global warming is the UK responsible for? I heard 2% of total warming so if we are taxed into oblivion and produce 0% global warming we are still fecked.

            7. If detrimental Global warming is bol lux (remember without global warming the earth would be uninhabitable) how will we know, we'll just be told, well done we averted the unimaginable, "now give us the rest of your cash, the skies falling and we need to build a very big column :-)

            8. Energy efficient lightbulds = bol lux its a window tax!

            Nice to see chicken little is allive and well and coming to a town hall near you in the not to distant future.
            Last edited by vista; 29 October 2006, 20:30.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by s2budd
              About time !
              For a start car tax should double for all cars that use petrol, then double the next year and then double the following year.

              There is far too much packaging on everything and air travel prices compared to train travel prices are crazy.
              You are the local village idiot, and I claim my £5.
              What about people who live in rural areas, where there is no public transport?
              Petrol is less polluting than diesel, by emissions per litre.
              Yes, there is too much packaging, but why punish the consumer? Why not punish the producer?
              Air travel is cheaper than train travel despite the vast subsidies handed out to train companies bcause planes can go where the passengers actually want to go, whereas trains only go where the tracks go. Therefore planes can be filled (by a number of means including offering competitive fares) whereas the train companies rely on their captive market (commuters) and couldn't care less about running empty trains for the rest of the time. Also the airlines run like businesses, and the rail companies just don't. It's likely they couldn't even if they wanted to, because of the terms of their franchises, but that's a different matter entirely.

              Oh, fuck it, why bother to address a problem, when you can tax it - G Brownstuff.
              His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

              Comment


                #8
                http://www.ace.mmu.ac.uk/Resources/F...lution/26.html


                Emissions for Road Vehicles (per vehicle kilometre)


                * Petrol car without a catalyst
                100 Carbon monoxide
                100 Hydro - carbons
                100 Oxides of nitrogen
                --- Particulate matter
                100 Carbon dioxide

                Petrol cars with a catalyst
                42 Carbon monoxide
                19 Hydro - carbons
                23 Oxides of nitrogen
                --- Particulate matter
                100 Carbon dioxide

                Diesel cars without a catalyst
                2 Carbon monoxide
                3 Hydro - carbons
                31 Oxides of nitrogen
                100 Particulate matter
                85 Carbon dioxide


                * Petrol cars without catalysts have been given a relative value of 100 for comparison

                Despite much debate over which car, petrol or diesel, is cleaner, weighing up the advantages and disadvantages is not easy. For example, diesel cars have been promoted, as they produce less CO and HC on average when compared to petrol cars, and they have greater fuel economy producing less CO2 per km. However recent health concerns about particulate matter have given diesels a less environmentally-friendly image, as have the higher emissions of nitrogen oxides compared with petrol cars. As a comparison, petrol cars produce virtually no particulate matter, take longer to warm up, produce more carbon dioxide per mile on average, and emissions of the regulated pollutants are higher.

                Cleaner Petrol and Diesel
                "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

                Comment


                  #9
                  Who drives a car? Rich, selfish, middle class (tax dodging) tory voters.
                  Who travels on planes? Rich, selfish, middle class (tax dodging) tory voters.
                  Who buys consumer goods? Rich, selfish, middle class (tax dodging) tory voters.

                  Can we see what the New Lie are doing here?

                  HTH

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by vista
                    This puppy has so many holes its probably a cheese.

                    1. Has there ever been a report on global warming that doesn't include the words 'could', 'might' or 'may'?

                    2. Global warming is just too convienent to be true, it allows the politicians to fleece us in taxes, gives many many scientists lots of cash and offers an amazing opportunity to town hall NAZI's to attack all their pet hate communities i.e. honest law abiding citizens (that make more money than them)

                    3. The only precise figures available are how much they're going to tax us, where are the precise reliable figures / predictions for what is actually going to happen and how they will spend the proceeds of the green extortion to prevent it?

                    4. Question the orthodoxy of global warming and you won't get answers to your questions just vilification on a par with racists and kiddie fiddlers.

                    5. So we're gonna be flooded! So where was all the water kept ready to flood us? If its the poles then my glass of iced wine offers some hope? Displacement etc.

                    6. How much global warming is the UK responsible for? I heard 2% of total warming so if we are taxed into oblivion and produce 0% global warming we are still fecked.

                    7. If detrimental Global warming is bol lux (remember without global warming the earth would be uninhabitable) how will we know, we'll just be told, well done we averted the unimaginable, "now give us the rest of your cash, the skies falling and we need to build a very big column :-)

                    8. Energy efficient lightbulds = bol lux its a window tax!

                    Nice to see chicken little is allive and well and coming to a town hall near you in the not to distant future.
                    It all has similar parallels to the millenium bug

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X