Hi - this is my first post, so please be gentle and apologies if this is a daft question!
I had a call from a company who is on a PSL with a bank and seems to be a halfway house between an "recruitment agent"/"body shop" and a "consultancy". Basically they want to put me forward for potential roles at a client bank. It's speculative and something may come of it or something may not. However, they need me to sign a Restriction agreement. I was fine with this until I read the following clauses that say that for a period of 6 months after termination
“...the Contractor shall not either alone or jointly with or as agent of any other person, firm, company or organisation directly or indirectly, and shall procure that any of its directors, employees, subcontractors, or agents shall not, in competition with xxxx, solicit or entice away or endeavour to solicit or entice away from Xxxx the custom of any person or company who or which was a client of, potential client of or did business with xxxx and to which the Contractor was introduced through Xxxx; ... solicit, entice away from, employ or engage or endeavour to solicit, entice away from, employ or engage any person who was a director or senior employee of any company which was a client of, potential client of, did business with or was introduced to them by the other Party; nor...solicit, entice away from, employ or engage or endeavour to solicit, entice away from, employ or engage any person who was a director or senior employee of the other Party, except with that Party’s prior consent...”
At first glance, this looks like a fairly reasonable anti-poaching clause that I would expect in a contract where a role has been secured, but given where we are in the discussions, if nothing comes of the role (i.e., the client doesn’t want me for that particular role), then does that mean this prevents me from applying for any other roles at that same client either directly or other agencies/consultancies?"
Termination is deemed to be the date upon which the parties cease discussions regardless of whether we enter into an agreement for the provision of services.
TIA
I had a call from a company who is on a PSL with a bank and seems to be a halfway house between an "recruitment agent"/"body shop" and a "consultancy". Basically they want to put me forward for potential roles at a client bank. It's speculative and something may come of it or something may not. However, they need me to sign a Restriction agreement. I was fine with this until I read the following clauses that say that for a period of 6 months after termination
“...the Contractor shall not either alone or jointly with or as agent of any other person, firm, company or organisation directly or indirectly, and shall procure that any of its directors, employees, subcontractors, or agents shall not, in competition with xxxx, solicit or entice away or endeavour to solicit or entice away from Xxxx the custom of any person or company who or which was a client of, potential client of or did business with xxxx and to which the Contractor was introduced through Xxxx; ... solicit, entice away from, employ or engage or endeavour to solicit, entice away from, employ or engage any person who was a director or senior employee of any company which was a client of, potential client of, did business with or was introduced to them by the other Party; nor...solicit, entice away from, employ or engage or endeavour to solicit, entice away from, employ or engage any person who was a director or senior employee of the other Party, except with that Party’s prior consent...”
At first glance, this looks like a fairly reasonable anti-poaching clause that I would expect in a contract where a role has been secured, but given where we are in the discussions, if nothing comes of the role (i.e., the client doesn’t want me for that particular role), then does that mean this prevents me from applying for any other roles at that same client either directly or other agencies/consultancies?"
Termination is deemed to be the date upon which the parties cease discussions regardless of whether we enter into an agreement for the provision of services.
TIA
Comment