• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Amy Lame - Inside or outside IR35?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Amy Lame - Inside or outside IR35?

    Is she or not?
    And after April?

    Khan's Troll Aide Paid Via Company, Pays No Income Tax - Guido Fawkes Guido Fawkes
    See You Next Tuesday

    #2
    oh dear as some posters said - how very Labour
    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

    Comment


      #3
      Who knows whether she is inside or outside for that particular contract? Without knowing all the details, it's more lazy reporting that anyone who uses a limited company MUST be doing so to avoid tax. Without seeing the company return, there's no detail about whether she pays PAYE at all, or even whether there is any income tax due for that contract.

      Reporting like this doesn't help the legitimate contractor at all.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by missinggreenfields View Post
        Who knows whether she is inside or outside for that particular contract? Without knowing all the details, it's more lazy reporting that anyone who uses a limited company MUST be doing so to avoid tax. Without seeing the company return, there's no detail about whether she pays PAYE at all, or even whether there is any income tax due for that contract.

        Reporting like this doesn't help the legitimate contractor at all.
        And has probably been written by an idiot that is in the same position as her.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
          Who cares ... she actually changed her surname to Lame? Lol **** me ...
          Guido Fawkes was born a stains. Though he changed his first name to Paul. Who wants to be called Seamen?

          Comment


            #6
            Ask your accountant.

            NLUK

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by missinggreenfields View Post
              Who knows whether she is inside or outside for that particular contract? Without knowing all the details, it's more lazy reporting that anyone who uses a limited company MUST be doing so to avoid tax. Without seeing the company return, there's no detail about whether she pays PAYE at all, or even whether there is any income tax due for that contract.

              Reporting like this doesn't help the legitimate contractor at all.
              No they aim to bash at someone for using ltd. without knowing all the details. Same as what the lady in question is doing as part of the job in question...

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Lance View Post
                How very, er... Lame
                His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

                Comment


                  #9
                  if she is truly paying no income tax it does stink.

                  He hasn't proved that as far as I can see.

                  Though in light of the changes to government contractors surely a FTC is a better choice for engaging her if she is only providing her own labour.
                  Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X