• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Food for Thought

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Food for Thought

    There's a query on Accountacy / Legal site about whether you can claim food as a tax deductable expense. My answer is below....

    ---------

    Only if the food you've eaten is strictly for business purposes only. If the IR suspect that the food you ate was nutrionally sound enough to give you enough strength and energy for reacreational activity as well as your business activities, then this is unlikely to be tax deductable.

    Items definitely vetoed by Gordo:

    Mars Bars - The advertising slogan 'A Mars a Day helps you Work, Rest and Play' disqualifies them instantly.

    Slim-a-soup or Weightwatchers food range - the IR deem these to be for personal use only because they help you lose weight and there is no proveable correlation that losing weight adds to the profitability of any IT business.

    Items open to interpretation:

    Cup-a-soup or Pot Noodle - because they contain no nutrients, Gordo could not conclusively claim during an IR enquiry that eating some would give you energy in your own time, but equally you couldn't prove that it did during business hours either. Therefore, eating them are taken as pointless recreational pursuits even when you are at work.

    Tax deductable:

    Chinese food - it fills you up instantly, gives you some energy, but then you're starving only a few hours later. Provided you can demonstrate with timed restaurant or take-away receipts that the meal was bought at breakfast or lunchtime and no later, it's a safe bet that's its allowable.

    Crisps - provided you can demonstrate that you bought and consumed the item in the morning. They contain potato, so they do contain a few complex carbohydrates. The bag is so small, however, by the end of the working day any nutritional benefit would have worn off.

    Useful tax dodge: Nutritional Avoidance

    Some dubious umbrellas are encouraging contractors to use 'Nutritional Avoidance' to help contractors claim all the foods they eat as tax deductable. However, they must eat laxative chocolate and claim both the food and LC as tax deductable to play this loophole. These dodgy umbrellas claim that laxative chocolate taken after eating any food rids your body of any of the sustained nutrional benefits that could have carried over into recreational time.

    However, safer brollies don't recommend it as it is not foolproof. This is because it has yet to be tested in the courts whether it is just the food normally eaten would be tax deductable or just the laxative chocolate used to rid the body of all foods eaten. Good accountants would equally claim that the IR would consider this 'nutritional evasion' rather than 'nutritional avoidance' and deem it a benefit-in-kind because the extra time spent on the toilet is a deliberate strategy that in no way can be deemed to increase the profitability of your business and therefore cannot be deemed a business expense.

    #2
    nice
    Serving religion with the contempt it deserves...

    Comment


      #3
      Is there a minimum amount of food required to get you through the working day? I.e. If you don't have lunch, you might fall asleep at 3pm, whereas having lunch might see you throught to at least 7pm. If you would normally finish at 5pm, then you can only claim 50% of the cost of lunch. Any more would be a BIK.
      Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

      Comment


        #4
        Malvio mentions in another post that it has to be "not at your normal place of work" in order to expense. This seems fairly subjective. Do you agree there is this restriction and could you provide a tighter definition?

        Also, from perhaps a philosophical perspective some have mentioned that you'd have to eat anyway regardless of whether you were doing a contract a or not. Or is the above also material from a legal/accounting perspective?

        Thanks,

        Chris
        Last edited by christhedon; 12 November 2006, 13:09.

        Comment

        Working...
        X