• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Oh dear (tm): Blair hit by Saudi bribery threat

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Oh dear (tm): Blair hit by Saudi bribery threat

    Originally posted by The Sunday Times
    SAUDI ARABIA is threatening to suspend diplomatic ties with Britain unless Downing Street intervenes to block an investigation into a £60m “slush fund” allegedly set up for some members of its royal family.

    The payments, in the form of lavish holidays, a fleet of luxury cars including a gold Rolls-Royce, rented apartments and other perks, are alleged
    to have been paid to ensure the Saudis continued to buy from BAE under the so-called Al-Yamamah deal, rather than going to another country. Al-Yamamah is the biggest defence contract in British history and has kept BAE in business for 20 years.

    The Saudis, key allies in the Middle East, have also threatened to cut intelligence co-operation with Britain over Al-Qaeda, and have repeated their threat that they will terminate payments on a defence contract that could be worth £40 billion and safeguard at least 10,000 British jobs.

    The Saudis had been given the impression during a meeting with Blair in July last year that the inquiry would be stopped.
    So Blair will either have to cave in and call off the SFO, publicly turning a blind eye to massive bribery, or lose us 10,000 jobs and Saudi support against terror. I wonder which he'll choose?

    #2
    saudi

    saudi princes are even into drugs (they smuggle it into europe) if you to know the truth

    Comment


      #3
      'Saudi support against terror'... is only given when it suits them, of course.

      The biggest losers from all this will be the likes of heather mills, allegedly.
      Vieze Oude Man

      Comment


        #4
        Surely PM can't just call off the investigation - that would be obstruction of justice and he simple can't possibly legally do anything like this, especially now that it was leaked - probably intentionally just to tell Saudis that since it is known they can't do anything: the guys from authoritarian regimes simply don't understand how is it the PM or the President can't just pick up a phone and stop investigation.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by AtW
          ... simply don't understand how is it the PM or the President can't just pick up a phone and stop investigation.
          Really?
          The PM/President are willing to kill thousands in the national interest. So you think they will not do it to save their skin and votes?
          Johnny Talibani Mumbai

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by ImNotFromIndia
            The PM/President are willing to kill thousands in the national interest.
            Don't confuse morale and legal issues - invasion in Iraq is legal under UK laws.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by AtW
              Don't confuse morale and legal issues - invasion in Iraq is legal under UK laws.
              True enoug...

              All I'm saying is that you have too much faith in the British Democracy/Legal systems. To think that the PM or anyone else would let that BAE contract goes to another country ... you would be sadly mistaken. Let's face it, other countries would only happen to pay the bribe!!!
              Johnny Talibani Mumbai

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by ImNotFromIndia
                All I'm saying is that you have too much faith in the British Democracy/Legal systems.
                I was in court once (and won), and regularly read about legal cases - so far the impression is more than favourable: UK courts make very good balanced decisions, in some criminal cases they are too lax, but that's because Govt does not build enough prisons and effectively forces them avoid imprisonment, the fault is on the Executive branch.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by AtW
                  I was in court once (and won), and regularly read about legal cases - so far the impression is more than favourable: UK courts make very good balanced decisions, in some criminal cases they are too lax, but that's because Govt does not build enough prisons and effectively forces them avoid imprisonment, the fault is on the Executive branch.
                  Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

                  Loony

                  You listen too much to the propaganda.
                  Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                  threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by threaded
                    You listen too much to the propaganda.
                    Yes, but at least it smells of roses...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X