Second Brexit referendum needed because Leave voters are dying off, Nick Clegg suggests
I can't fault his logic...
In 2016, 443525 people aged 65 and over died in the UK. This figure is more or less similar on a year by year basis.
Apparently 64% of people aged 65 and over voted Brexit. So 283856 fewer Brexit voters every year and 159669 fewer Remain voters.
I believe that every year, about 800,000 people turn 18 every year, and so become eligible to vote. About 71% of these vote Remain. So by that token, 568000 new Remain voters and 232000 new Leave voters.
The net being 408000 new Remain voters and 52000 fewer Leave voters, every year.
The 'Leave' campaign won by 1,269,501
So a little maths shows that 2.7 years after the original referendum, that the 1269501 majority would be completely wiped out. Coincidentally, that would be around March 2019.
Of course, this assumed 100% turnout, but I think if there was a second referendum then turnout would be higher than the first, on the basis that Brexiters would turn out in force to avoid overturning, and Remainers would turn out in force to get the overturn they have moaned about.
Add in a swing in the 'still alive' population from Leave to Remain, then it stands to logic that a second referendum, an Exit from Brexit referendum if you listen to Vinny C, held in early 2019, would result in a Remain:Leave vote of about 52:48. (Of course, Nigel would cry that this is unfinished business)
Is this the long game? Is Cleggy right?
I can't fault his logic...
In 2016, 443525 people aged 65 and over died in the UK. This figure is more or less similar on a year by year basis.
Apparently 64% of people aged 65 and over voted Brexit. So 283856 fewer Brexit voters every year and 159669 fewer Remain voters.
I believe that every year, about 800,000 people turn 18 every year, and so become eligible to vote. About 71% of these vote Remain. So by that token, 568000 new Remain voters and 232000 new Leave voters.
The net being 408000 new Remain voters and 52000 fewer Leave voters, every year.
The 'Leave' campaign won by 1,269,501
So a little maths shows that 2.7 years after the original referendum, that the 1269501 majority would be completely wiped out. Coincidentally, that would be around March 2019.
Of course, this assumed 100% turnout, but I think if there was a second referendum then turnout would be higher than the first, on the basis that Brexiters would turn out in force to avoid overturning, and Remainers would turn out in force to get the overturn they have moaned about.
Add in a swing in the 'still alive' population from Leave to Remain, then it stands to logic that a second referendum, an Exit from Brexit referendum if you listen to Vinny C, held in early 2019, would result in a Remain:Leave vote of about 52:48. (Of course, Nigel would cry that this is unfinished business)
Is this the long game? Is Cleggy right?
Comment