• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

David Davis and a time machine

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    David Davis and a time machine

    Back in 2002...

    There is a proper role for referendums in constitutional change, but only if done properly. If it is not done properly, it can be a dangerous tool. The Chairman of the Public Administration Committee, who is no longer in the Chamber, said that Clement Attlee—who is, I think, one of the Deputy Prime Minister's heroes—famously described the referendum as the device of demagogues and dictators. We may not always go as far as he did, but what is certain is that pre-legislative referendums of the type the Deputy Prime Minister is proposing are the worst type of all.

    Referendums should be held when the electorate are in the best possible position to make a judgment. They should be held when people can view all the arguments for and against and when those arguments have been rigorously tested. In short, referendums should be held when people know exactly what they are getting. So legislation should be debated by Members of Parliament on the Floor of the House, and then put to the electorate for the voters to judge.

    We should not ask people to vote on a blank sheet of paper and tell them to trust us to fill in the details afterwards. For referendums to be fair and compatible with our parliamentary process, we need the electors to be as well informed as possible and to know exactly what they are voting for. Referendums need to be treated as an addition to the parliamentary process, not as a substitute for it.
    https://publications.parliament.uk/p...t/21126-17.htm
    Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

    #2
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    How true...
    Do what thou wilt

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by darmstadt View Post

      Ahhh never mind.

      Comment


        #4
        Elections should only be held when the public is in a good place to decide.

        Which is when they will vote for me.....

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
          Elections should only be held when the public is in a good place to decide.

          Which is when they will vote for me.....
          I'd vote for you.

          Are we talking about "Who should be first against the wall when the revolution comes"?
          …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

          Comment


            #6
            Maybe DD could borrow HMRC's time machine.....

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by WTFH View Post
              I'd vote for you.

              Are we talking about "Who should be first against the wall when the revolution comes"?
              "Who has offered admin the biggest bribe to become CUK poster of the year"?

              Though I am worried as my offer did not specify best or worst.....

              Comment

              Working...
              X