- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Leave Alliance view of WTO
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Comment
-
One can say, unequivocally, that the UK could not survive as a trading nation by relying on the WTO Option. It would be an unmitigated disaster, and no responsible government should allow it. The option should be rejected.Comment
-
Parliament is going to make a decision next week within 3 days of May's defeat and no deal is the least likely option.
The most likely one is Brino ++ complete with the customs union.
I'm alright JackComment
-
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostNo (transition) deal is exactly what’s going to happen
Deliberately hurting the less well-off and the people that need help the most.
Comment
-
What I can't fathom out is why, going into the ref, Norway (ETFA EEA) was being touted as an option, but once the ref had been run that option seemed to just be dismissed by Davis and co. As a remainer I can see the benefits in ETFA; not as good as we have today, but at least not a total destruction of our economy. It would have been a fairly easy sell to parliament too.
2.5 years on ... how did this shambles of a government get it so wrong?I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostWhat I can't fathom out is why, going into the ref, Norway (ETFA EEA) was being touted as an option, but once the ref had been run that option seemed to just be dismissed by Davis and co. As a remainer I can see the benefits in ETFA; not as good as we have today, but at least not a total destruction of our economy. It would have been a fairly easy sell to parliament too.
2.5 years on ... how did this shambles of a government get it so wrong?I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostWhat I can't fathom out is why, going into the ref, Norway (ETFA EEA) was being touted as an option, but once the ref had been run that option seemed to just be dismissed by Davis and co. As a remainer I can see the benefits in ETFA; not as good as we have today, but at least not a total destruction of our economy. It would have been a fairly easy sell to parliament too.
2.5 years on ... how did this shambles of a government get it so wrong?
Just like Trump they did not expect to win, but lies and Putins helping hand got us where we areComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment