• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Waiting for the End of World

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Waiting for the End of World

    Over 4.5 Billion people could die from Global Warming-related causes by 2012

    Hydrate hypothesis illuminates growing climate change alarm

    Compiled by John Stokes

    A recent scientific theory called the "hydrate hypothesis" says that historical global warming cycles have been caused by a feedback loop, where melting permafrost methane clathrates (also known as "hydrates") spur local global warming, leading to further melting of clathrates and bacterial growth.

    In other words, like western Siberia, the 400 billion tons of methane in permafrost hydrate will gradually melt, and the released methane will speed the melting. The effect of even a couple of billion tons of methane being emitted into the atmosphere each year would be catastrophic.

    The "hydrate hypothesis" (if validated) spells the rapid onset of runaway catastrophic global warming. In fact, you should remember this moment when you learned about this feedback loop-it is an existencial turning point in your life.

    By the way, the "hydrate hypothesis" is a weeks old scientific theory, and is only now being discussed by global warming scientists. I suggest you Google the term.

    Now that most scientists agree human activity is causing the Earth to warm, the central debate has shifted to when we will pass the tipping point and be helpless to stop the runaway Global Warming.

    There are enormous quantities of methane trapped in permafrost and under the oceans in ice-like structures called clathrates. The methane in Arctic permafrost clathrates is estimated at 400 billion tons.

    Methane is more than 20 times as strong a greenhouse gas as CO2, and the atmosphere currently contains about 3.5 billion tons of the gas.

    The highest temperature increase from global warming is occurring in the arctic regions-an area rich in these unstable clathrates. Simulations from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) show that over half the permafrost will thaw by 2050, and as much as 90 percent by 2100.

    Peat deposits may be a comparable methane source to melting permafrost. When peat that has been frozen for thousands of years thaws, it still contains viable populations of bacteria that begin to convert the peat into methane and CO2.

    Western Siberia is heating up faster than anywhere else in the world, having experienced a rise of some 3C in the past 40 years. The west Siberian peat bog could hold some 70 billion tonnes of methane. Local atmospheric levels of methane on the Siberian shelf are now 25 times higher than global concentrations.

    By the way, warmer temperatures and longer growing seasons have caused microbial activity to increase dramatically in the soil around the world. This, in turn, means that much of the carbon long stored in the soil is now being released into the atmosphere.

    Releases of methane from melting oceanic clathrates have caused severe environmental impacts in the past. The methane in oceanic clathrates has been estimated at 10,000 billion tons.

    55 million years ago a global warming chain reaction (probably started by volcanic activity) melted oceanic clathrates. It was one of the most rapid and extreme global warming events in geologic history.

    Humans appear to be capable of emitting CO2 in quantities comparable to the volcanic activity that started these chain reactions. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, burning fossil fuels releases more than 150 times the amount of CO2 emitted by volcanoes.

    Methane in the atmosphere does not remain long, persisting for about 10 years before being oxidized to CO2 (a greenhouse gas that lasts for hundreds of thousands of years). Chronic methane releases oxidizing into CO2 contribute as much to warming as does the transient methane concentrations.

    To summarize, human activity is causing the Earth to warm. Bacteria converts carbon in the soil into greenhouse gasses, and enormous quantities are trapped in unstable clathrates. As the earth continues to warm, permafrost clathrates will thaw; peat and soil microbial activity will dramatically increase; and, finally, vast oceanic clathrates will melt. This global warming chain reaction has happened in the past.

    Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 rose by a record amount over the past year. It is the third successive year in which they have increased sharply. Scientists are at a loss to explain why the rapid rise has taken place, but fear the trend could be the first sign of runaway global warming.

    Runaway Global Warming promises to literally burn-up agricultural areas into dust worldwide by 2012, causing global famine, anarchy, diseases, and war on a global scale as military powers including the U.S., Russia, and China, fight for control of the Earth's remaining resources.

    Over 4.5 billion people could die from Global Warming related causes by 2012, as planet Earth accelarates into a greed-driven horrific catastrophe.

    Bibliographic reference courtesy of Brad Arnold who has an extensive resrarch background on Global Warming.

    #2
    Alf .. can't you just post a summary ... too much to read at this time of the night mate...

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
      By the way, the "hydrate hypothesis" is a weeks old scientific theory, and is only now being discussed by global warming scientists. I suggest you Google the term.
      Make that a "decades old" scientific theory.

      (Doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong though.)
      Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

      Comment


        #4
        Already some hydrate sci-fi

        http://www.amazon.co.uk/Transcendent...e=UTF8&s=books

        Not such a good book but it is based on the hydrate feedback, turn into venus scenario.


        We are doomed in a epochal extinction event kinda style.....

        Comment


          #5
          We've had permafrost warming before, and massive melting at the end of the ice ages. How come this hydrate hypothesis didn't result in runaway warming then?

          Comment


            #6
            More to the point, what effect will this have on house prices?

            In any case, Tony Blair said "science" will sort it all out and in the meantime keep on rocking and paying your green taxes.

            Comment


              #7
              Have the Mayans got it right then?

              http://www.levity.com/eschaton/Why2012.html
              Me, me, me...

              Comment


                #8
                Alf, you reckoned the world was going to come to an end last year. Iranian oil bourse or some other conspiracy theory wasn't it?

                AJP is Old Mother Shipton and I claim my fiver.
                I'm Spartacus.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by SandyDown
                  Alf .. can't you just post a summary ... too much to read at this time of the night mate...
                  Doomed!!!! Doomed I tell you!!!!!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    If this is the case, it is reassuring, why...., because for most of the Earth's history there hasn't been polar caps. That means this methane, which certainly hasn't been produced by man must have been floating around. Since in earlier times Earth didn't turn into Venus, the calculations must be wrong, and therefore the assumptions based on how gases contribute to global warming are probably exagerated.

                    In any case there was a much higher concentration of CO2 in the armosphere at the time of the dinosaurs, when the world was covered in luscious forests, and indeed it was this high concentration that led to plants changing the atmosphere.

                    I must say I think there are good scientific arguments but some scientists and activists just enjoy scaremongering. I think these people would have been puritans in the 17th century.
                    I'm alright Jack

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X