• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Political correctness has eroded the nature of free debate

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Political correctness has eroded the nature of free debate

    RRH's post 'CUK's Far right underbelly' has got me thinking about how much political correctness has eroded the nature of free debate.

    The propensity to use the term 'racist' or racism' is as prevalent as people liberaly drop the word ****' into a conversation.

    In the late 80s / early 90s there was still a debate that defined racism as opposed to racial prejudice (those of you that may have studied radical black feminist writers of the time may be familiar). Racial prejudice was quite simple; having an opinion of a person or people based on prejudicial views linked to race/colour of skin/streotyping.

    However, racism was racial prejudice coupled with the power to impose that prejudice to the detriment of people of another race. One only has to think back to the times when black people were told by landlords that a tenancy had just been filled only for a white person to then come along and rent the same property. This is what was properly defined a true racism.

    However, in modern day Britain, political correctness has swept this away in favour of an all emcompassing definition of racism designed to 'shame' those that question it's logic or refuse to toe its line.

    If people are not free to argue their point, you drive it underground. Anything, that is driven underground, invariably adopts subversive methods to compensate for the lack of free debate. Abuse, mudslinging and simply posting inflamatory statements just to goad others is perhaps at the mild end of this subversive process.

    The debate is now here to be had.

    #2
    You'll get Lone Gunman and Cowboy Bob started on homophobia next
    The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

    But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

    Comment


      #3
      F**k political correctness.

      I'll punch the next person that supports PC to my face.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Kyajae
        RRH's post 'CUK's Far right underbelly' has got me thinking about how much political correctness has eroded the nature of free debate.

        The propensity to use the term 'racist' or racism' is as prevalent as people liberaly drop the word ****' into a conversation.

        In the late 80s / early 90s there was still a debate that defined racism as opposed to racial prejudice (those of you that may have studied radical black feminist writers of the time may be familiar). Racial prejudice was quite simple; having an opinion of a person or people based on prejudicial views linked to race/colour of skin/streotyping.

        However, racism was racial prejudice coupled with the power to impose that prejudice to the detriment of people of another race. One only has to think back to the times when black people were told by landlords that a tenancy had just been filled only for a white person to then come along and rent the same property. This is what was properly defined a true racism.

        However, in modern day Britain, political correctness has swept this away in favour of an all emcompassing definition of racism designed to 'shame' those that question it's logic or refuse to toe its line.

        If people are not free to argue their point, you drive it underground. Anything, that is driven underground, invariably adopts subversive methods to compensate for the lack of free debate. Abuse, mudslinging and simply posting inflamatory statements just to goad others is perhaps at the mild end of this subversive process.

        The debate is now here to be had.
        Isn't there anything on daytime TV you could watch?

        Here, this may help: http://tinyurl.com/45zo3

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by realityhack
          I'll punch the next person that supports PC to my face.
          Your IT helpdesk will be shatting themselves if they read that.
          "If it floats, flies, or f***s, lease it." - Evel Knievel when he wasn't jumping buses or women

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Captain Dispensable
            Your IT helpdesk will be shatting themselves if they read that.

            Comment


              #7
              I can't think of a better place to have a massdebate than this site.
              The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

              But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Bagpuss
                I can't think of a better place to have a massdebate than this site.
                I said stop flirting with me!!!!!

                The pope is a tard.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Captain Dispensable
                  Your IT helpdesk will be shatting themselves if they read that.
                  I am not sure that is the correct use of the future progressive tense.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Kyajae
                    RRH's post 'CUK's Far right underbelly' has got me thinking about how much political correctness has eroded the nature of free debate.

                    The propensity to use the term 'racist' or racism' is as prevalent as people liberaly drop the word ****' into a conversation.

                    In the late 80s / early 90s there was still a debate that defined racism as opposed to racial prejudice (those of you that may have studied radical black feminist writers of the time may be familiar). Racial prejudice was quite simple; having an opinion of a person or people based on prejudicial views linked to race/colour of skin/streotyping.

                    However, racism was racial prejudice coupled with the power to impose that prejudice to the detriment of people of another race. One only has to think back to the times when black people were told by landlords that a tenancy had just been filled only for a white person to then come along and rent the same property. This is what was properly defined a true racism.

                    However, in modern day Britain, political correctness has swept this away in favour of an all emcompassing definition of racism designed to 'shame' those that question it's logic or refuse to toe its line.

                    If people are not free to argue their point, you drive it underground. Anything, that is driven underground, invariably adopts subversive methods to compensate for the lack of free debate. Abuse, mudslinging and simply posting inflamatory statements just to goad others is perhaps at the mild end of this subversive process.

                    The debate is now here to be had.
                    An interesting thought. What do you think political correctness is? Depending on your view it's anything from a Marxist plot to censor free speech to a right-wing invention to smear the left.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X