Ban Alcohol

[DodgyAgent]

Well no decent counterargument has been made to my "ban fishing" thread. To remind you I made the ban plea on the basis that it was cruel to fish and that it was a hobby/sport that was pursued by sad losers who society has no need of.

So up next is alcohol.

No one has yet to be killed by passive smoking and no one gets beaten up or killed by someone under the influence of Nicotine. What is more Hitler never banned alcohol though he did ban cigarette smoking.

So any of you who think that banning smoking is reasonable whereas banning alcohol is not then let us hear it.

[thunderlizard]

If you banned alcohol, you could probably follow that up quite easily by banning kebabs and curries.

[VectraMan]

No one has yet to be killed by passive smoking and no one gets beaten up or killed by someone under the influence of Nicotine. .

I take it you have reasons for not counting Roy Castle?

[Buffoon]

If you banned alcohol, you could probably follow that up quite easily by banning kebabs and curries.

ARRRRRRGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHH!

RIOT !

[Rantor]

Well no decent counterargument has been made to my "ban fishing" thread. To remind you I made the ban plea on the basis that it was cruel to fish and that it was a hobby/sport that was pursued by sad losers who society has no need of.

So up next is alcohol.

No one has yet to be killed by passive smoking and no one gets beaten up or killed by someone under the influence of Nicotine. What is more Hitler never banned alcohol though he did ban cigarette smoking.

So any of you who think that banning smoking is reasonable whereas banning alcohol is not then let us hear it.

Have they banned smoking?

Banning alcohol and other such drugs is as close to impossible as it gets.

Been tried, doesn't work and will never work.

[Let-Me-In]

Well no decent counterargument has been made to my "ban fishing" thread. To remind you I made the ban plea on the basis that it was cruel to fish and that it was a hobby/sport that was pursued by sad losers who society has no need of.

So up next is alcohol.

No one has yet to be killed by passive smoking and no one gets beaten up or killed by someone under the influence of Nicotine. What is more Hitler never banned alcohol though he did ban cigarette smoking.

So any of you who think that banning smoking is reasonable whereas banning alcohol is not then let us hear it.

I thought sad, lonely, pathetic losers bevcame recruitment consultants? Isn't that what you do when you cannot get a real job?

You say no "decent" arguement was raised in your ban fishing thread, maybe because it was a stup[id thread with very weak arguements on your side?

And "noone has been killed by passive smoking", where have you been the last 50 years? There has been a mountain of evidence to show that you can catch cancer by passive smoking. You are an idiot.

[DodgyAgent]

I take it you have reasons for not counting Roy Castle?

So did it say on his death certificate that he died from passive smoking? No
Was it proved that he died from passive smoking .. no
was it assumed that he died from passive smoking.. yes.

[Troll]

23:08

[DodgyAgent]

Have they banned smoking?

Banning alcohol and other such drugs is as close to impossible as it gets.

Been tried, doesn't work and will never work.

so banning something has nothing to do with public interest or principle? it must therefore be political

[alreadypacked]

23:08

Not paying you enough attention