• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

oh dear: Darling to extend Rock lifeline

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    oh dear: Darling to extend Rock lifeline

    Darling to extend Rock lifeline
    By Iain Dey

    British taxpayers face the prospect of propping up Northern Rock for months to come amid signs that the Government has caved in to pressure from the ailing mortgage bank and its advisers.

    The Sunday Telegraph has learned that advisers to Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, are working on plans that would allow all or part of the £25bn lifeline that has already been extended to Northern Rock by the Bank of England to continue indefinitely.

    Although European Union rules block the bank from receiving state aid beyond February 17, lawyers are drafting documents that could change the status of the funding to "restructuring aid". This would allow the Bank of England to continue providing funding to Northern Rock - and aid any takeover of the bank.

    Darling is expected to lay out a "statement of principles" detailing the Government's views on the future of Northern Rock in the next 10 days.

    Northern Rock has also been investigating the possibility of using loans from the European Central Bank to refinance its borrowings from the Bank of England - a move which would be hugely embarassing to the Chancellor, who has already come under fire over his role in the crisis.

    The Liberal Democats yesterday called for Northern Rock to be nationalised (AtW's comment: yes, affordable houses for all...), and demanded that the Chancellor "explain the position of the bank" to the House of Commons tomorrow. The calls follow the resignation of Northern Rock's chief executive Adam Applegarth and several other directors on Friday. Bryan Sanderson, the Northern Rock chairman, also appointed two new non-executive directors - John Devaney, former Marconi chairman, and Simon Laffin, a consultant with CVC, the private equity firm.

    Sanderson is now believed to be looking for a third new non-executive with a legal background. It is understood Anna Mann, the pre-eminent headhunter, has been drafted in to help. The proposed move comes amid expectations that the company and its directors could face legal action over the handling of the process.

    One of Northern Rock's biggest shareholders has demanded that the ongoing sale of the bank be stopped. Jon Wood, the Monaco-based hedge fund manager who controls 6 per cent of shares, is understood to have told the Northern Rock board on Thursday that a break-up of the bank was both ill-advised and unnecessary.

    Northern Rock's advisers received at least eight indicative proposals from potential bidders for the bank on Friday, including one from Virgin Group and the management buy-in proposal put forward by Luqman Arnold, the former chief executive of Abbey National.

    The Northern Rock board is meeting later today to discuss the offers it has received.

    ING, the Dutch bank, and Apollo, the US private equity firm, are also understood to have lodged an interest. JC Flowers, the US private equity group, is expected to table an offer early this week. It is unclear whether Cerberus, another US private equity group, will table an offer.

    It is understood that Virgin has secured a funding package from a consortium of banks led by Royal Bank of Scotland worth a combined sum of £20bn. Under the Virgin proposal, roughly £10bn of the Bank of England funding line could be refinanced straight away, with the rest repaid over time. It is also proposing to inject £1bn of equity into the company.

    It is unclear how Arnold proposes to raise funding. It is understood he wants to be appointed chief executive of Northern Rock with immediate effect and is said to believe any attempt to buy the bank outright would end up destroying value unnecessarily.

    #2
    Northern rock should be nationalised and closed down.

    The people that can pay for the mortgages and are not in arrears should have the mortgages sold to other banks in order to help recoup some of the £25billion.

    The rest should be evicted and the houses sold on the open market.

    Northern rocks assets should be stripped down and sold to the highest bidder.


    I have 0% sympathy for Northern Rock or anyone that works for them including the people in the call centres. They wanted a total of £1600 in fees which they got told to swivel on.

    Time for the govt to let the ****er crash, stick the interest rates up 2% and get this economy under control. The crash now will be less painful than it will in a years time when it self implodes.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Sockpuppet View Post
      Northern rock should be nationalised and closed down.

      The people that can pay for the mortgages and are not in arrears should have the mortgages sold to other banks in order to help recoup some of the £25billion.

      The rest should be evicted and the houses sold on the open market.

      Northern rocks assets should be stripped down and sold to the highest bidder.


      I have 0% sympathy for Northern Rock or anyone that works for them including the people in the call centres. They wanted a total of £1600 in fees which they got told to swivel on.

      Time for the govt to let the ****er crash, stick the interest rates up 2% and get this economy under control. The crash now will be less painful than it will in a years time when it self implodes.
      And this is why you'll always remain a truck-driver.
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        #4
        You will make an excellent chancellor sock

        With me being PM of course

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by sasguru View Post
          And this is why you'll always remain a truck-driver.
          BOOMED!

          Comment


            #6
            Maybe the biggest problem here is pricing the assets - i.e. the mortgage book. It obviously has some value - but no-one knows exactly what.

            Nationalisation is a good idea, it means it can be de jure a state enterprise because it is clear to everyone it is already a de facto one. A corollary of the latter is it's a pointless entity on the FTSE; effectively a company without any liabilities (the state looks after them) and questionable assets.

            The state should finish the process and sell the assets to the highest bidder, with a reserve on the price to cover taxpayer costs.

            I should add, I don't think the state should have intervened in the first place.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by NoddY View Post
              I should add, I don't think the state should have intervened in the first place.
              The intervention was correct in my view: there was a risk that this panic would move to the other banks who were in a very bad position from liquidity point of view. Ask yourself what depositors did with the money they took out NR? They took them across the street into other banks! So in effect BoE helped improve liquidity for other banks without tainting them in having to ask BoE to help with the money. That's why they saved NR and they were right.

              What is wrong however is to let this thing drag on for so long - NR should have been split up and auctioned in parts: banks would have bought bits and pieces without significantly increasing their own risk.

              Comment


                #8
                This is just another f***-up in a long line of f***-ups by the useless party in government.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by wendigo100 View Post
                  This is just another f***-up in a long line of f***-ups by the useless party in government.
                  These are just chickens coming home - the big mistake was to create an economy based on debt, in a short term is helps to achieve growth, but in a long term it will lead to serious problems.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by AtW View Post
                    These are just chickens coming home - the big mistake was to create an economy based on debt, in a short term is helps to achieve growth, but in a long term it will lead to serious problems.
                    'Investing' capital in a non productive resource, such as housing, is a complete waste. No new wealth is created. The low interest regime of the last decade has been wasted on houses; the debt mire created has produced no fruits.

                    True economic progress is only possible by investing in human labour - all economic benefits are the products of human endeavour aided by technology; this is something both Adam Smith and Karl Marx agree on and yet New Labour think they know better.

                    So you can base an economy on debt - but only if it produces dividends.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X