• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Mortgage firms rush to repossess homes as families feel credit crunch

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Mortgage firms rush to repossess homes as families feel credit crunch

    Mortgage firms rush to repossess homes as families feel credit crunch
    By SEAN POULTER

    Market slowdown: Thousands face losing their homes next year
    Britain is facing its own sub-prime loan crisis as "aggressive" mortgage lenders rush to repossess thousands of properties, it is claimed today.

    Firms specialising in loans to those on low incomes or with a risky credit history are taking a hardline approach when customers fall behind on payments, says Citizens Advice (CA).

    The collapse of such sub-prime mortgages in the U.S. was the catalyst for the global credit crunch that has left banks nursing huge losses and damaged the finances of British consumers and the economy.

    Some industry analysts suggest repossessions in this country could hit 70,000 next year - the highest since 1991.

    The CA claims the crisis has been fuelled by the finance companies which have sold expensive home loans that were "doomed to fail".

    The alarm was sounded as the Conservative leader called on lenders to be "socially responsible" and help homebuyers who fall into arrears.

    David Cameron is particularly worried about 1.4million buyers who face a "payment shock" when their cheap fixed-rate deals end in the next 12 months.

    He suggested lenders should find ways to lessen the impact of a predicted £200 a month increase in average repayments.

    The CA report, which looked at 1,200 cases, reveals how the dream of home ownership has turned sour for many people on low incomes.

    Its research has found that as many as 770,000 people have missed at least one mortgage or secured loan payment in the last 12 months.

    The CA study, Set up to Fail, found that dubious advice from brokers, irresponsible lending and an aggressive approach to those in arrears is driving an increase in court actions for repossession.

    It claims sub-prime lenders have handed out loans to many people on low incomes or with a patchy credit history that they cannot repay.

    CA chief executive David Harker said: "Our research suggests that many aspiring home owners have been mis-sold unsuitable and costly loans that are doomed to fail from the start.

    "Many sub-prime lenders are flouting the rules on responsible lending by granting loans when it's clear the borrower will not be able to afford to repay it from the very outset, then getting tough immediately things go wrong.

    "Far from providing housing security and a valuable asset, home ownership has proved a fast track to debt and homelessness for many vulnerable borrowers on low incomes."

    The CA found sub-prime lenders are quick to take court action for relatively small amounts of arrears.

    The charity claims they are failing to abide by laws that require them to treat customers fairly. It says these rules need to be more rigorously enforced.

    The charity also wants to see a regime that ensures court action for repossession is only used as a last resort.

    Mr Cameron told the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) yesterday he supports this approach.

    "The last thing any of us want to see is the type of housing market difficulties that are taking place in the U.S ... There, a million homeowners are in the process of having their house repossessed," he said.

    He added: "Where borrowers are struggling to cope with the sudden-hike in repayments, I want to see banks and building societies help overburdened mortgage holders manage the transition to higher interest rates."

    The CML dismissed the Citizens Advice analysis as "simplistic" and "sensationalist". It denied sub-prime lenders were rushing to repossess.

    CML chief Michael Coogan said: "This report is in no way typical of the vast majority of cases where lenders work constructively with borrowers to get them over periods of financial difficulty and keep them in their homes."

    ---

    Why would they rush to repossess? Because they know that taking over the house now and selling it will give them more or less maximum value for the house. Doomed!

    #2
    They should re mortgage before the fixed term expires
    Confusion is a natural state of being

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Diver View Post
      They should re mortgage before the fixed term expires
      Not everyone will be able to move to another bank - that's what credit crunch is about, subprimers or even higher can't get new credit. This means they will have to accept the rate on morgage that their current bank offers, who, naturally, will try to ramp up the rate knowing they can't go elsewhere.

      Also, cost of getting morgage has increased considerably - looks like lenders now want a %-tage of the house price, 2-3%, so if house is valued £200k then this morgage fee will be £4-6k.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        Not everyone will be able to move to another bank - that's what credit crunch is about, subprimers or even higher can't get new credit. This means they will have to accept the rate on morgage that their current bank offers, who, naturally, will try to ramp up the rate knowing they can't go elsewhere.

        Also, cost of getting morgage has increased considerably - looks like lenders now want a %-tage of the house price, 2-3%, so if house is valued £200k then this morgage fee will be £4-6k.
        I thought the percentage charge was ramped on to the mortgage loan ?
        Just so that they can charge interest on that too.
        Confusion is a natural state of being

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Diver View Post
          I thought the percentage charge was ramped on to the mortgage loan ?
          I reckon a lot of subprimers or anyone close to them simply won't get any new morgage apart from really high rates (8-9%), they won't handle it. So it's going to be the issue of negative equity - if they are in positive territory they can try to sell house and move to renting, but should there be a sudden fall in house prices next year then these people will be really stuffed along with the economy.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by AtW View Post
            I reckon a lot of subprimers or anyone close to them simply won't get any new morgage apart from really high rates (8-9%), they won't handle it. So it's going to be the issue of negative equity - if they are in positive territory they can try to sell house and move to renting, but should there be a sudden fall in house prices next year then these people will be really stuffed along with the economy.
            I thought that there was government legislation in place now that helped protect people in Debt and in repossession situations.
            and if not there should be
            Confusion is a natural state of being

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              The CA claims the crisis has been fuelled by the finance companies which have sold expensive home loans that were "doomed to fail".
              Don't the people who bought them have any sort of responsibility?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                Don't the people who bought them have any sort of responsibility?
                Naughty Brillo everything bad that happens is always the fault of someone else.
                How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                  Don't the people who bought them have any sort of responsibility?
                  No because the majority of them are thick as s*** when it comes to financial matters after all house prices only go up.
                  "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I can't wait until "negative equity" is in the news every day. It'll be like old times.
                    Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X