• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Just to add to the doom, two big IR35 losses

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Just to add to the doom, two big IR35 losses

    http://www.shout99.com/contractors/s...le.pl?id=48586

    Two IR35 defeats cost contractors £130,000
    by Susie Hughes at 15:33 18/01/08 (News on IR35)

    A spate of recent IR35 cases has seen two victories for the Revenue and two for the contractors.

    Special Commissioner Charles Hellier, who ruled on both cases which were wins for HMRC found that contractors, Dragonfly Consulting Ltd and MKM Computing Ltd, had become part of the team and integrated into their client companies. Do not mix with permies.

    Increasingly its seems that HMRC and the Commissioners are looking beyond the terms of the contract - even back-to-back contracts - and examining the working practises of the arrangement as seen through the eyes of the client. Do not do what the clients ask of you.

    In some cases, where the contract has included ' the right of substitution', the client has refuted this would have been the case in practical terms. Some of these cases date back several years.

    #2
    http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...-99-000-a.html

    Missed the ball on that one prawn old boy

    Comment


      #3
      I saw it there in L&A, but lets face it, General is where the Sun readers and Labour voters reside.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
        IGeneral is where the Sun readers and Labour voters reside.
        Which one is you then? Coctail prawn champaigne socialist?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
          I saw it there in L&A, but lets face it, General is where the Sun readers and Labour voters reside.

          My favorites shortcut points straight to 'General'... are you saying there's more???
          Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

          Comment


            #6
            "he provided his services from April 2000 to January 2003 to the AA as an IT system tester.

            ...blah blah blah...

            The outstanding PAYE and NI amounted to £99,000. "

            How the feck could 3 years work result in £99k?!!!

            I'm genuinely terrified for all of us.
            The pope is a tard.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
              "he provided his services from April 2000 to January 2003 to the AA as an IT system tester.

              ...blah blah blah...

              The outstanding PAYE and NI amounted to £99,000. "

              How the flip could 3 years work result in £99k?!!!

              I'm genuinely terrified for all of us.
              Some porky pies being told somewhere. I think we worked out that was his total tax liability which implied he hadn't paid any tax over the period he was investigated.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                My favorites shortcut points straight to 'General'... are you saying there's more???
                Excellent, another potential new recruit. Come join us in TPD where we're dedicated to the pursuit of deciphering the profound meaning of jdjdsjd.
                ǝןqqıʍ

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
                  Some porky pies being told somewhere. I think we worked out that was his total tax liability which implied he hadn't paid any tax over the period he was investigated.
                  Ah Cheers for that Ardesco - I nearly had a heart attack!!

                  I need to read that other thread then I guess?
                  The pope is a tard.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    IR35 terrifies me every day. Sometimes I just want to pack it all in.

                    Can anyone help me with this thought. When I sit down at coffee break and discus my project with other contractors and I implement their ideas, or they send me small bits of code which I use am I actualy using a sub?
                    When I get the wife to proof read a report or enter values into a spread sheet would that amount to the same thing?
                    If there is a requirement to payfor a sub then maybe we should all try and farm out some of our work to temp agencies or pay our mates to do a bit for us. I would also suggest doing it without our clients knowledge (where legal) to defacto get around control questions too.
                    I am not qualified to give the above advice!

                    The original point and click interface by
                    Smith and Wesson.

                    Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X