-
-
"The BBC insists that the site is designed to encourage discussion of the Corporation’s shows and will help raise awareness among youngsters about the risks of using the internet"
What a load of bolloox. -
Waste of bl**** money."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
why not?Comment
-
The BBC is funded by the tax payer. Disney et al are commercial channels.Originally posted by Clippy View Post
If ITV decided to set up a social networking site for brats I would be fine with it."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Don't ITV own FriendsReunited nowadays? That site has certainly benefitted from their take over.Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
The BBC has a commercial arm and if they want to get an extra income stream from this then why not? Especially if it keeps the license fee down.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostScience isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
Like any business, they have to generate revenue, particularly as the license fee falls well short of their needs. If they didn't, the license fee would go up.Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
They are leveraging their assets which is a smart move.
As for ITV & Friends Reunited, classic case of not developing your assets and being overtaken by newer rivals - Facebook, MySpace, Bebo.
But ITV is in a mess at the moment, so not surprising.Comment
-
But it won't keep the license fee down.Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
Comment