(Unofficial) CUK Best Website awards

[realityhack]

Don't delay, submit your nominations today!

Must be SFW
Categories are:

Most innovative/unique concept
Best navigation & usability
Best graphic design
Best use of emerging web technologies (including rich media)
Best content

Winners will be announced by carrier pigeon, and will be awarded as many dancing bananas as these servers will allow.

[The Master]

My Submission

http://www.contractoruk.com

[TheFaQQer]

I think that this site is great: http://www.cuteable.com

Fantastic example of regular blogging for web traffic, and provides a daily dose of "cute" things to look at / buy. Great for when you want to be a little bit romantic and surprise your partner (although it's mainly geared towards girls) with something extra special, as things tend to be hand-made on there.

[TheFaQQer]

Or http://tinyurl.com/2sudfj is a great one too - a wonderful example of what a group of people with far too much time on their hands can accomplish.

[Lucifer Box]

This is good example of a truly terrible looking site but it is so useful (to bakers) that it has come to dominate its market inspite of itself.

http://www.marzipanworld.com/

[Ruprect]

http://www.contractoruk.com

[Clippy]

I think that this site is great: http://www.cuteable.com

Fantastic example of regular blogging for web traffic, and provides a daily dose of "cute" things to look at / buy. Great for when you want to be a little bit romantic and surprise your partner (although it's mainly geared towards girls) with something extra special, as things tend to be hand-made on there.

Is this your wifes site?

The congregation needs to know if the honourable gentleman has a financial interest in this website.

If so, why was it not declared in the members interest book?

[DS23]

Or http://tinyurl.com/2sudfj is a great one too - a wonderful example of what a group of people with far too much time on their hands can accomplish.

[DS23]

i've said it before and i'll say it again:

http://www.beedogs.com/

This is good example of a truly terrible looking site but it is so useful (to owners of beedogs and potential owners of beedogs) that it has come to dominate its market inspite of itself.

[Churchill]

i've said it before and i'll say it again:

http://www.beedogs.com/

This is good example of a truly terrible looking site but it is so useful (to owners of beedogs and potential owners of beedogs) that it has come to dominate its market inspite of itself.

Now that is just plain wrong!