• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Taxman Bankrupt man over 88p, realise it was mistake but still want him to pay costs

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Taxman Bankrupt man over 88p, realise it was mistake but still want him to pay costs

    HMRC couldnt organise a pissup in a pub, poor guy, HMRC released it was there mistake but still wanted him to pay £2k costs.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008.../incometax.tax

    #2
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith

    Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek

    That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay

    Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - Cyberghoul

    Comment


      #3
      snaw is bored by anything that may reflect bady on New Labour and Socialism.

      Comment


        #4
        They ought to privatise HMRC and allow people to sue them.
        Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
        threadeds website, and here's my blog.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
          snaw is bored by anything that may reflect bady on New Labour and Socialism.
          It's got nothing to do with NL.

          The Tax man acted like this when the previous lot were in charge.

          tim

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by tim123 View Post
            It's got nothing to do with NL.

            The Tax man acted like this when the previous lot were in charge.

            tim
            Then surely this bunch of arses should have sorted the problem by now?
            If she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood. And therefore a witch!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by tim123 View Post
              It's got nothing to do with NL.

              The Tax man acted like this when the previous lot were in charge.

              tim
              You're not trying to suggest the Civil Service are politically impartial are you?

              Those days are long gone...

              Older and ...well, just older!!

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by tim123 View Post
                It's got nothing to do with NL.

                The Tax man acted like this when the previous lot were in charge.

                tim
                Well, you're bang out of order there, as when the previous lot were in charge the Inland Revenue didn't have the powers to pull stunts like this. It is only with the meddling of the New Lie by slamming Customs into the mix that they've got these powers, which they absolutely should not have as the front line staff just don't have the training that a Customs officer receives. It is essentially just another New Lie created screw-up, no more, no less.
                Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
                  You're not trying to suggest the Civil Service are politically impartial are you?

                  Those days are long gone...

                  When it comes to collection, yes.

                  tim

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by threaded View Post
                    Well, you're bang out of order there, as when the previous lot were in charge the Inland Revenue didn't have the powers to pull stunts like this.
                    Stunts like what?

                    Assessing you for a randon (large) amount of tax, leaving you to contest it and bankrupting you if you don't?

                    They most certainly did have that power (and they used it).

                    tim

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X