• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Tax Avoidance Schemes - Labour is after you

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Tax Avoidance Schemes - Labour is after you

    From the Budget:

    4.64 The disclosure regime, introduced at Budget 2004, allows the Government to respond to avoidance swiftly and in a targeted fashion. Following announcements at the 2007 Pre-Budget Report and subsequent consultations, the Government will legislate in Finance Bill 2008 to improve the existing system of identifying users of disclosed tax avoidance schemes,
    and will legislate later in 2008 to extend the stamp duty land tax (SDLT) disclosure rules to residential property worth £1 million or above. A formal response to this aspect of the consultation will be published in due course, including the timetable for consulting on and introducing secondary legislation.
    4.65 The Government announces measures to address a number of avoidance schemes, many of which have been identified through the disclosure regime:

    •• ending of the use of artificial arrangements by individuals to create trading
    losses to offset against other income through sideways loss relief;
    •• closure of a number of highly artificial avoidance schemes involving
    partnerships and trusts that seek to avoid a charge under the controlled
    foreign companies rules;
    •• clarification that the application of the related party rules in the corporate
    intangible assets regime is unaffected by any insolvency arrangements in
    which any company or partnership may be involved;
    •• clarification of legislation relating to employment-related shares and
    securities, to ensure rules to prevent double taxation are not exploited to reduce the amount of tax and national insurance paid on employment income
    ;
    •• confirmation that a company’s relief on its pension contributions in a given
    year are limited to the actual contributions it has made in that year;
    •• clarification of SDLT anti-avoidance provisions introduced in Finance Act
    2008, to tackle SDLT avoidance which exploited legislation intended to help
    the transfer of property between different partners within an investment
    partnership; and
    •• measures to counter two schemes designed to avoid payment of SDLT. The first scheme misuses provisions intended to help financial institutions using alternative finance schemes. The second scheme misuses provisions to allow group relief from SDLT.

    4.68 The Government announces, with retrospective effect from 12 March 2008, clarification of indefinitely retrospective legislation introduced in 1987 to counter double taxation treaty avoidance schemes, so that the legislation applies as intended and is effective.
    This will ensure that, notwithstanding the wording of any double taxation treaty, UK residents pay UK tax on their profits from foreign partnerships. Budget 2008 announces there will also be a further measure to prevent future tax avoidance through the misuse of double taxation
    treaties by UK residents.

    #2
    Clarity is NOT something that HMRC do. Deliberately so.

    Comment


      #3
      4.68 The Government announces, with retrospective effect from 12 March 2008, clarification of indefinitely retrospective legislation introduced in 1987 to counter double taxation treaty avoidance schemes, so that the legislation applies as intended and is effective.
      This will ensure that, notwithstanding the wording of any double taxation treaty, UK residents pay UK tax on their profits from foreign partnerships. Budget 2008 announces there will also be a further measure to prevent future tax avoidance through the misuse of double taxation
      treaties by UK residents.
      Does this mean Montpelier ceases working from today, and hence the government admits that anyone funnelling all their contract income through it since 2001 was doing so perfectly legally?

      If I recall correctly, this scheme gave you a take-home of something like 85%, and of the remainder HMRC only got about a third.

      Comment


        #4
        The clock is ticking.......
        Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
        Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

        Comment


          #5
          Doesn't look good, I am with twentyplus, have just sent a mail asking their position and plans.
          Politicians are wonderfull people, as long as they stay away from things they don't understand, like working for a living!

          Comment


            #6
            Just spoke to Twentyplus, apparently their legal team are meeting now and should have a statement in a few days time.

            In the meantime I am looking as to what my other options are....
            Politicians are wonderfull people, as long as they stay away from things they don't understand, like working for a living!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by portseven View Post
              Just spoke to Twentyplus, apparently their legal team are meeting now and should have a statement in a few days time.

              In the meantime I am looking as to what my other options are....
              Go Ltd. And make sure twentyplus will cover the costs of HMRC investigating you.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Cheshire Cat View Post
                Go Ltd. And make sure twentyplus will cover the costs of HMRC investigating you.
                And how are they going to do that it they have zero income?

                tim

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by tim123 View Post
                  And how are they going to do that it they have zero income?

                  tim
                  Correct.

                  Many of these scams could see a mass exodus, the scam, sorry scheme, going bust and contractors losing whatever money they have in there.

                  Act NOW.

                  Sign new contracts, get whatever they owe you, instruct your agency not to send them another PENNY.

                  Your money is at risk! Forget Northern Rock, these schemes are far, far, far more dangerous.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I'm sure that the smart providers will find something new that they can try with the same degree of success.

                    The cynic in me says that there must be some other loopholes that can be exploited.
                    Best Forum Advisor 2014
                    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X