• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Only Saddam Hussein can run Iraq, says aide (sentenced by Saddam)

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Only Saddam Hussein can run Iraq, says aide (sentenced by Saddam)

    Only Saddam Hussein can run Iraq, says aide

    By Damien McElroy in Baghdad
    Last Updated: 7:36pm GMT 16/03/2008

    A prominent figure in the Iraqi opposition movement that helped propel America and Britain to war in 2003 has said the country would be better off if Saddam Hussein was still in power.

    Lufti Saber, once a key lieutenant of the first post-Saddam Iraqi prime minister, Ayad Allawi, has a ringside seat on the new Baghdad regime as an aide to the American-led military coalition.

    But the political manoeuvring and administrative incompetence he has witnessed on a daily basis has led the former political prisoner to radically revise his views of the invasion of Iraq.

    "None of these people trust each other," he said. "Everything comes down to that. The whole system is set up to ensure that nobody does anything that somebody else thinks is wrong.

    "Saddam had a way of rising above that. As soon as he made a decision, it happened. People knew it had to be done. It didn't matter where they were in the country, they knew the floor at work had to be cleaned, just in case Saddam turned up. Now the country is engulfed in chaos and nobody does anything because they all refuse to take responsibility."

    Iraq marks the fifth anniversary of the US-led invasion this week, plagued by problems seen only in failed states.

    Many former supporters of the invasion share a bleak outlook on the country's future prospects, though polls show general population retains hopes for the future.

    Mr Saber spent eight years on death row during Saddam's dictatorship before he was release in an eve of battle amnesty.

    He had worked for Dr Allawi's Iraq National Accord, which in the mid-1990s was based in the Kurdish enclave in northern Iraq.

    Before his arrest, Mr Saber was instrumental in orchestrating a failed coup within the senior military ranks in 1996.

    "I never thought I would say it given that he sentenced me to death," he said. "But I find myself wishing Saddam was still here. Only he had the knack of running this god-forsaken country."

    Despite the failure of the putative putsch, Dr Allawi, a secular Shi'ite Muslim from a prominent Baghdad merchant family, emerged as a close ally of Western intelligence agencies, including MI6 and the CIA.

    After the invasion, he stood as one of a handful of potential leaders of a new government.

    But Washington installed an interim administration, the Coalition Provision Authority, which struggled to establish its authority.

    By the time Dr Allawi accepted a leather-bound portfolio certifying his appointment as interim prime minister in July 2004, a multi-pronged insurgency had already taken root.

    With Iraqi's splitting along confessional lines, there was no prospect of the kind of revitalised secular state he sought flourishing.

    Fundamentalist Shi'ite political parties triumphed in the 2005 elections and have held sway ever since.

    Baghdad, once a cluttered stew of religious and ethnic groups, emerged from the 2006 civil war as a predominately Shi'te city, pocketed with Sunni enclaves.

    When Saddam was executed in 2006, Shi'te politicians danced around his body. Mr Saber suffered in the sweep of violence across the city.

    "My home is in Ameriya district, which was mixed but is now exclusively Sunni," he said.

    "I've had to move to a flat which is an area that is protected. My family are in Syria. It is unbelievable to me that I am so close to not being able to live in my country."

    Credible surveys estimate that 4 million Iraqis have been displaced since 2003, half forced outside its borders.

    The numbers of killed will never be known but have been estimated as high as 650,000, equivalent to 2.5 per cent of the population.

    Iraqis rank the failure to provide electricity and basic services such as health care as a more grievous wrong than the absence of security.

    Despite billions of dollars of foreign aid, most parts of Baghdad get less than 6 hours of electricity a day from the national grid, and often as little as two. (AtW's comment: but on the plus side Haliburtons shareholders have got nice payouts)

    Mr Saber blames the predominance of former exiles in the post-Saddam government for the failure to create a functioning state.

    At least a dozen senior figures, including both former prime ministers, a deputy prime minister and the national security advisor, keep homes and families in London.

    Jalal Talabani, Iraq's president, remarked at a dinner with his top advisers for members of the British embassy that he was the only person present who did not have a UK passport.

    After a split with Dr Allawi, Mr Saber left Iraqi politics. He now works for the American and British officers responsible for training the Iraqi army.

    As such his job puts him in daily contact with both Iraqis and their American advisors.

    Despite the presence of 140,000 American, and 4,000 British troops, in Iraq, he believes the loyalties of most government officials lie with the regimes in the Middle East most hostile to the emergence of a democratic state.

    "We have the Americans and British here in great numbers and I can see Iraq has failed to take advantage," he said.

    "When I ask why I conclude the officials just want to benefit themselves by resting on the support of Iran or Turkey. It's a tragedy."

    -------

    Without this war oil would have cost $25-30, hundreds of billions of dollars would have been saved (over trillion for sure), backwards regimes around the world would not get finance from high oil prices too and Iran would not dare developing nukes.

    Good job shaunbhoys of this world who supported this stupid expensive war - even someone who was sentenced by Saddam now thinks differently.

    #2
    Only a new-con hawk evangelical could say that the death of 650,000+ people is justified in the name of "democracy".
    I for one think that when you pull all the social services overnight, you can expect trouble. The neo-con's tried ultra-shock therapy on Iraq with the same success as in Russia...that is, complete failure.
    McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
    Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
      The neo-con's tried ultra-shock therapy on Iraq with the same success as in Russia...that is, complete failure.
      What neocons have got to do with plight of Russia in the 90s?

      Russians as a nation tend to blaim everything and everyone for their own troubles - especially jews, having considerd that subject in a fair detail I think as a nation such hatred only has got parallels in Nazi Germany and Palestine - perhaps the latter have got some practical reasons, but the views of the people in Russia are certainly racist that crossed border of clinical mental illness.

      I am just finishing reading one discussion thread on one Russian newspaper - people there with complete seriousness talk about stuff like Japan needs new war, and of course USA will attack Russia and that how good it will be that everyone will be nuked - it would have been funny if it was not for that kind of guys controlling nuclear weapons

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        Only Saddam Hussein can run Iraq, says aide
        That is not really a very constructive suggestion now is it?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Gonzo View Post
          That is not really a very constructive suggestion now is it?
          It is constructive in that it suggest that democracy is not for Iraq, they need a dictator like Saddam.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by AtW View Post
            What neocons have got to do with plight of Russia in the 90s?
            Correct me...but did not Russian politicians consult various economic "experts" on reforming the economy. And did these experts not advise the immediate dismantling of the socialist infrastructure?
            McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
            Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              It is constructive in that it suggest that democracy is not for Iraq, they need a dictator like Saddam.
              A dictator like Saddam is not what the title said. Who is going to be the person to break it to them that Saddam is no longer, er, available?

              Iraq is really three countries. We need to blame the people that created it who didn't really know what they were doing for the current mess.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Gonzo View Post
                Iraq is really three countries. We need to blame the people that created it who didn't really know what they were doing for the current mess.
                UK is really three countries. We need to blame the people that created it who didn't really know what they were doing for the current mess.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  UK is really three countries. We need to blame the people that created it who didn't really know what they were doing for the current mess.
                  It's actually more than three countries. Lots of the counties were originally countries in their own right.......

                  Anyway like other countries being a United Kingdom stops serious fighting.
                  "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                    It's actually more than three countries. Lots of the counties were originally countries in their own right.......
                    But I am sure if you were the Queen you'd rule them all well?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X