• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

House prices: 50% falls before fair value

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    House prices: 50% falls before fair value

    Recent house price falls represent just a fraction of the potential 50% downside shown when growth is measured against historical data stretching back almost 60 years.

    Health warning: If you are highly mortgaged, or have recently bought property, reading this article could seriously damage your health

    http://www.citywire.co.uk/adviser/-/...2949&ea=118560

    #2
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    Recent house price falls represent just a fraction of the potential 50% downside shown when growth is measured against historical data stretching back almost 60 years.

    Health warning: If you are highly mortgaged, or have recently bought property, reading this article could seriously damage your health

    http://www.citywire.co.uk/adviser/-/...2949&ea=118560
    They've already fallen 15% in 6 months.

    Comment


      #3
      Recent house price falls represent just a fraction of the potential 50% downside shown when growth is measured against historical data stretching back almost 60 years.
      How many people owned their own home 60 years ago? This data is worthless as it doesn't consider certain trends such as population growth and relative affluence.

      According to a local news report a few nights ago house prices haven't fallen in my area of the south west.
      Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
        How many people owned their own home 60 years ago? This data is worthless as it doesn't consider certain trends such as population growth and relative affluence.
        OK, I take it all back then, cos it's different this time

        No, actually I don't because all investment bubbles eventually burst. Housing became the must do investment fad, and it's starting to deflate.

        Comment


          #5
          http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/calculator.asp

          If you use this crude calculator it seems Northern Ireland accounts for the biggest falls (-12% compared to UK average of -2.5% which includes NI) but if you compare prices from 8 years ago Northern Ireland had by far the biggest gains in the first place.

          When mortgages and investments are sold there is a government warning they carry which states rates can go down as well as up and historical data cannot be relied upon, yes it is very different from 60 years ago.
          Last edited by gingerjedi; 1 May 2008, 20:18.
          Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Turion View Post
            Recent house price falls represent just a fraction of the potential 50% downside shown when growth is measured against historical data stretching back almost 60 years.

            Health warning: If you are highly mortgaged, or have recently bought property, reading this article could seriously damage your health

            http://www.citywire.co.uk/adviser/-/...2949&ea=118560
            What a one track, one trick pony nobhead you really are. YAWN.
            If she weighs the same as a duck, she's made of wood. And therefore a witch!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Turion View Post
              Recent house price falls represent just a fraction of the potential 50% downside shown when growth is measured against historical data stretching back almost 60 years.

              Health warning: If you are highly mortgaged, or have recently bought property, reading this article could seriously damage your health

              http://www.citywire.co.uk/adviser/-/...2949&ea=118560
              It's okay Turion, you're safe aren't you. renting a dingy basement bedsit.

              >YAWN<
              Confusion is a natural state of being

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                How many people owned their own home 60 years ago? This data is worthless as it doesn't consider certain trends such as population growth and relative affluence.

                60 years maybe, but 70s-now is pretty representative of things. I'd say the graph shows we have pretty good predictor of house price trends, and it links up well to the economic cycle. When the recession hits there is no way house prices won't significantly fall, especially, as we can now also see, many immigrants will leave in a downturn.
                The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

                But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

                Comment


                  #9
                  Turion lives in a coucil house

                  Turion,

                  Your posting history clearly illustrates that you have a deep and abiding loathing for anyone who actually owns property.

                  I own several properties, have no mortgages, and receive a modest income from them.

                  So what's your problem?

                  Are you some sort of socialist who would have my property confiscated for the good of the state?

                  You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
                    Turion,

                    Your posting history clearly illustrates that you have a deep and abiding loathing for anyone who actually owns property.

                    I own several properties, have no mortgages, and receive a modest income from them.

                    So what's your problem?

                    Are you some sort of socialist who would have my property confiscated for the good of the state?

                    You look like a commie to me comrade.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X