What do you reckon

**threaded** · 31 July 2005, 14:13

The cosmos is much much bigger than the earth.

According to cosmologists that is.

**EternalOptimist** · 31 July 2005, 14:16

oops

**xoggoth** · 31 July 2005, 14:29

Energy does not fall due to entropy. It only evens out and becomes unuseable. So bang goes your theory. Probably. Since starting to write this I have forgotten what your theory was. It's all Chico's fault or something? I agree.

**SupremeSpod** · 31 July 2005, 15:56

Originally posted by EternalOptimist

I dont normally go along with consiracy theories but it occurred to me that

Global Warming

if there is a finite amount of energy in the universe
then if Earth gets warmer the cosmos must get cooler

but the cosmic amount of energy is falling due to entropy
so the cosmos is cooling at an accelerated rate(entropy + GW)

if global warming is due to man

then man is causing the end of the universe and all you lot can do is slag Chico off

Maybe we're suffering from a localised phenomenon.....?

In the grand scope of things, maybe we're an anomaly....?

ITFOT, things'll sort themselves out.

Spod - In "LIGAF" mode!

BTW, Chico is a c u n t!

**Chico** · 31 July 2005, 18:58

Take The Challenge

**DodgyAgent** · 31 July 2005, 21:37

The default

Originally posted by Chico

Take The Challenge

What is obvious is that religion survives on fear and ignorance. If science has no answer to a phenomenon (the creation of the universe) then the concept of the existence of god fills the vacuum. In other words, when we have no understanding of something the default explanation is that it is the work of god.
As science is continually delivering answers to so many of these questions religious fanatics like chico are left clutching at straws.
Several hundreds of years ago all that was needed was a few stars at night, a few floods, an earthquake or two to convince people that god existed. Of course now that there are logical scientific explanations to most of the phenomenons of the past the fanatics have been forced backwards to the outer reaches of the universe.

I am sorry chico, but science will continue to erode the fabric of your superstition

**Lucifer Box** · 1 August 2005, 06:10

Highly entertaining questions, subtly structured to deceive the unwary. For example the first question has answers that use the word "cosmos" and "universe" interchangeably to steer the user down the "right" path.

Somewhat similar to:

Q: Do you believe the moon is made of cheese?

Yes - it is made of cheese
No - it is not made of lemons

**Chico** · 1 August 2005, 06:12

Dodgy by name dodgy by reasoning

Give me just one example where any doscovery be it scientific, historical or archaelogical has disproved anything in the Bible. Just one. Lets go.

**threaded** · 1 August 2005, 06:20

Matt 6, 5-8

What do you reckon