• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Short selling......was it to blame?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Short selling......was it to blame?

    Maybe, or maybe not. Perhaps the popular press got it wrong:


    Short sellers could not have been to blame for the share price falls in UK banks, according to data just published, as consultants warn the shorting freeze imposed by the Financial Services Authority has damaged market confidence.

    The level of stock borrowing of HBOS shares, whose price tumble last week led to the bank being taken over by rival Lloyds TSB, was 3% of the available shares last Friday, according to UK analyst DataExplorers. It had been at about this level, which is typical of all UK public companies, since August.


    Investors need to borrow stock if they want to sell shares short, and the level of stock borrowing is used as a proxy for the amount of short selling. The levels of stock borrowing of other UK banks was also in single digits. At Bradford & Bingley, it was 6.8% of the shares available to be lent; at Alliance & Leicester, it was 6.8%; Standard Chartered, 2.3%; Lloyds TSB, 3.1%; Barclays, 4.5%; HSBC, 2.8%; and at RBS, 1.2%.Jacob Schmidt, chief executive of independent hedge fund research firm Schmidt Research
    Partners, said: "The numbers are extremely low. They are lower than we thought." UK politicians have lambasted hedge funds as "spivs" that used short selling to force down the share price of UK banks such as HBOS. The low levels of stock on loan show these criticisms are misdirected, Schmidt said. "Hedge funds are only partially to blame, if at all."
    Moreover, the effect of the ban has been to reduce confidence in the market for financials stocks, according to investors. Although their critics claim short sellers artificially dampen companies' share prices, asset managers say short selling normally plays a role in lowering the price of shares that have risen too high and, while short selling is frozen, investors are worried that share prices will no longer reflect the value of the companies concerned. Schmidt said: "Now even a long-only investor cannot buy financials shares with confidence because the market is being held up artificially and everyone knows it." Jeremy Hall, a partner and fund manager at boutique hedge fund manager Cartesian Capital, said of the freeze: “It could lead to a technically-driven market as share price movements are not down to fundamentals.”
    The volume of trading on Monday in HBOS' shares, 8 million, was the joint-lowest in 50 days, according to data published on Bloomberg. The 20 million shares traded yesterday was back within the normal range. A spokesman for the FSA said it hoped the introduction of the freeze on short selling on
    selected financials stocks, which allows existing short positions to be maintained but bans any new or increased short positions, would clamp down on market abuse and would therefore increase confidence in the market.
    Source: eFinancial news

    #2
    Originally posted by aceboy View Post
    Maybe, or maybe not. Perhaps the popular press got it wrong:




    Source: eFinancial news
    Doesnt take into account the practice of "Naked Shorting" where the trader doesnt actually bother to borrow the shares he is selling in the first place. They rely on being able to buy shares on the market at a profit in order to fullfill their sales before the deals are completed when the market closes. It is supposedly outlawed by the various market regulators but is effectively untracable in the normal course of things.
    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

    Comment


      #3
      Short selling, in the case of hedge funds causes panic by creating massive falls in share prices by selling of very large volumes of shares. These shares are not even owned by the hedge funds, but by their actions they cause other shareholders to sell because they fear losing their investments, which drives the price down even further.

      Borrowing by companies can be dependent on share price, so this activity can actually drive companies out of business very quickly.

      Therefore, short selling of shares should be banned permanently IMO.

      Comment


        #4
        People who make money from hedge fund 'industry' say "Hedge funds not to blame".

        In other news: Pope admits to Catholic leanings; ursine faeces discovered in sylvan glade. And now, a message from our sponsor.

        Comment


          #5
          lol

          Comment


            #6
            Yes.
            Stocks must never be sold, except at a loss.
            It's only fair.
            Bored.

            Comment


              #7
              No.

              Next.

              Comment


                #8
                No

                Next

                Comment


                  #9
                  Short sellers could not have been to blame for the share price falls in UK banks, according to data just published, as consultants warn the shorting freeze imposed by the Financial Services Authority has damaged market confidence.

                  The level of stock borrowing of HBOS shares, whose price tumble last week led to the bank being taken over by rival Lloyds TSB, was 3% of the available shares last Friday, according to UK analyst DataExplorers. It had been at about this level, which is typical of all UK public companies, since August.
                  Didn’t a fair number of the congregation make this very point at the time to be told that they were wrong and that mob rule, born of ignorance, should apply?
                  How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

                  Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
                  Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

                  "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
                    People who make money from hedge fund 'industry' say "Hedge funds not to blame".

                    In other news: Pope admits to Catholic leanings; ursine faeces discovered in sylvan glade. And now, a message from our sponsor.
                    Funny but not strictly accurate. DataExplorers does not seem to be linked to the hedge fund industry and the numbers can easily be verified.

                    Short selling is simply one of the means whereby the market identifies failing companies and reallocates capital ....
                    Hard Brexit now!
                    #prayfornodeal

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X