• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

EU governments take fuel action

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    EU governments take fuel action

    EU governments take fuel action

    Governments across Europe are taking action to curb fuel costs amid sporadic protests about rising petrol prices.

    France is to offer fuel tax rebates to farmers while President Jacques Chirac has called on petrol retailers to make meaningful cuts to pump prices.

    Retailers have cut prices in Austria after the government threatened a one-off tax on their profits.

    Belgium, Poland and Hungary have also announced measures to cushion the impact of rising prices on consumers.

    EU countries have come under pressure to control fuel costs amid a clamour for action from hauliers, farmers and motoring groups.

    The French government announced a package of measures on Tuesday designed to ease the situation for farmers.

    They will be offered tax breaks and refunds on fuel worth about 30m euros ($36.6m; £20.2m).

    "The rise in fuel prices penalises farms, which cannot always pass the cost on," Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin told a meeting of farmers in Rennes.

    "We must help them."

    Similar financial assistance was announced for hauliers on Monday.

    Farmers unions have said that they would study any government proposals before deciding whether to step up direct action.

    French President Jacques Chirac urged ministers on Tuesday to put pressure on petrol retailers to cut pump prices further.

    Austrian Chancellor Wolfgang Schuessel
    Austrian Chancellor Schuessel said fuel prices were far too high

    BP and Total announced price cuts last week but consumer and motoring groups said they have not gone far enough.

    A spokesman for President Chirac said that he had asked finance minister Thierry Breton to urge "companies to commit themselves rapidly and wholeheartedly to invest in non-polluting energy and step up the pace of price cuts at the pump".

    Tax threat

    Petrol prices are to come down in Austria with BP and Austrian retailer OEMV announcing cuts of 3 cents and 2 cents per litre respectively.

    Vienna had threatened to impose a windfall tax on the profits of leading petrol companies although the firms concerned said their decision was unconnected to the proposed measure.

    A BP spokesman in Austria said it had been able to cut prices because wholesale gasoline prices had fallen.

    The Polish and Hungarian governments have pledged to reduce excise and VAT duties on petrol while the Belgian government says it will reimburse VAT payments on home heating fuel.

    Speaking at the Frankfurt motor show, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said rising fuel prices were "certainly worrying".

    The British government has ruled out any direct action over fuel costs.

    Chancellor Gordon Brown ruled out cuts to fuel duties, instead urging Opec members to boost production and invest in new refineries.

    ----

    So the cheese eating surrender monkeys who already charge less tax than GBrown would give tax rebates, but HM Govt won't bulge?

    I have to say I will be waiting at how situation develops with great interest as my car is fully refulled and that should be enough for at least 2 months

    #2
    Originally posted by AtW
    I have to say I will be waiting at how situation develops with great interest as my car is fully refulled and that should be enough for at least 2 months
    Wish I could say the same. Filled up this evening (at a cost of £60 - Christ!), that'll last me til the weekend if I'm lucky.

    Lucky that Threaded is out of the country. Not only would it cause him difficulties driving both Lambos at once, but he'd need to remortgage to fill them up.
    Discuss PDA/Smartphones
    Yeovil Town FC - the real green & whites

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by dazza12
      Lucky that Threaded is out of the country. Not only would it cause him difficulties driving both Lambos at once, but he'd need to remortgage to fill them up.
      I hear threaded is running them on the same stuff at that car at the end of the first Back to The Future episode.

      Anyhow, I don't think there will be anything major this time, unless protesters knowingly underplayed their threat to catch Govt off guard. IMO would have been right to punish Gordon for his strealth taxes by costing him his job, this would have made an example, but I don't see much appetite for this -- he is clever to act in such a way that he is not a hated person even though he takes far more than Thatchers the Milk Snatcher and whoever got Poll Tax in place.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by AtW
        I hear threaded is running them on the same stuff at that car at the end of the first Back to The Future episode.
        I thought the general opinion was that they were being run on bulltulip?

        Anyways, back at the original point, agree with your general thrust, but the UK government already does offer massive fuel subsidies to agricultural users. If they were any more generous we'd be paying them to take the fuel.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Lucifer Box
          Anyways, back at the original point, agree with your general thrust, but the UK government already does offer massive fuel subsidies to agricultural users. If they were any more generous we'd be paying them to take the fuel.
          But most of people ain't agrocultural related, who gives a smeg about low price of red diesel if you can't have it? IMO its a load of bollox that motorists subsidise so much -- the amount that goes into roads is like 15% of the amount motorists pay, I don't think there is anybody else taxed so disproportionally apart from probably the very rich.

          Public transport is a joke, trains are fking expensive and simply lack capacity, I mean FFS when peak time ticket from Brum to London costs like 90 quid, which is than EasyJet return flights that lasts longer than train runs, then something is seriously wrong.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by zeitghost
            <I hear threaded is running them on the same stuff at that car at the end of the first Back to The Future episode>

            The "Home Fusion Generator(tm)"?
            no just more bulltulipe
            SA says;
            Well you looked so stylish I thought you batted for the other camp - thats like the ultimate compliment!

            I couldn't imagine you ever having a hair out of place!

            n5gooner is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
            (whatever these are)

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by AtW
              the amount that goes into roads is like 15% of the amount motorists pay, I don't think there is anybody else taxed so disproportionally apart from probably the very rich.
              Govt. gets 38 Billion income from duty, road fund licence etc from motorists. They spend 7 and I believe that includes on public transport.

              It is distinctly unfair that the motorist subsidises all other tax payers in such a way.
              I am not qualified to give the above advice!

              The original point and click interface by
              Smith and Wesson.

              Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

              Comment


                #8
                But that's the nature of tax systems. Virtually every taxpayer subsidises (unfairly in their view) some other sort of taxpayer, e.g. smokers subsidising non-smokers, binge drinkers subsidising tee-totallers, etc.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Lucifer Box
                  But that's the nature of tax systems. Virtually every taxpayer subsidises (unfairly in their view) some other sort of taxpayer, e.g. smokers subsidising non-smokers, binge drinkers subsidising tee-totallers, etc.
                  I agree to some extent.
                  Smokers and drinkers dont subsidise non smokers and drinkers they subsidise the NHS
                  I would not mind the tax on tobbaco and alcohol as long as it is spent funding the extra cost to the health service and nothing more.

                  It is unfair that any one person pays more than their FAIR share of tax. A driver who also smokes and drinks is paying a disproportionate amount of tax when compared to a tax payer who does none of these things, particularly when compared to the service they get.

                  The whole system has got out of kilter.

                  Road tax and fuel duty when introduced were entirely spent on the roads and public transport. Now they are used to fill a a black (or should that be Brown) hole in the economy.
                  I am not qualified to give the above advice!

                  The original point and click interface by
                  Smith and Wesson.

                  Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

                  Comment


                    #10
                    In my opinion, people who don't own a car, don't smoke and don't drink to excess are pure and simple tax evaders and should be treated as harshly as the law permits.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X