• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You can't go wrong with property investments

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    You can't go wrong with property investments

    The Buyer/Seller

    Average house price (1980): £23,348
    Average house price (2000): £81,202
    Deductions: Stamp duty £233, legal and other fees £700, maintenance £16,126, mortgage interest £41,091, capital repaid £14,942
    Overall loss: £15,238
    Sources: Nationwide, Savills, MoneyWeek

    The Renter

    Rental cost of average house (1980-2000): £80,630
    Gain from buyer deposit if invested in shares: £101,339
    Gain from other costs if invested in shares: £21,179
    Overall gain: £41,888
    Sources: Savills, Barclays Equity Gilt study, MoneyWeek


    Time to stop laughing at renters!

    #2
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    The Buyer/Seller

    Average house price (1980): £23,348
    Average house price (2000): £81,202
    Deductions: Stamp duty £233, legal and other fees £700, maintenance £16,126, mortgage interest £41,091, capital repaid £14,942
    Overall loss: £15,238
    Sources: Nationwide, Savills, MoneyWeek

    The Renter

    Rental cost of average house (1980-2000): £80,630
    Gain from buyer deposit if invested in shares: £101,339
    Gain from other costs if invested in shares: £21,179
    Overall gain: £41,888
    Sources: Savills, Barclays Equity Gilt study, MoneyWeek


    Time to stop laughing at renters!
    Good article - I am sure there must be something wrong here. Is it the "Gain from buyer deposit if invested in shares"? Seems very large to me.....

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
      Good article - I am sure there must be something wrong here. Is it the "Gain from buyer deposit if invested in shares"? Seems very large to me.....
      Remember the shares are pre dot-com crash. They went through the roof (geddit!)

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7726389.stm

      Comment


        #4
        Time to start laughing at people duped by primary school level statistics.

        It forgets that the Buyer has an asset worth £76k in that example.

        Also, the Renter has turned their potential deposit (prob around £2k) into £100k in 20 years?? How so?

        Utter tosh!
        Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
          The Renter

          Rental cost of average house (1980-2000): £80,630
          Loss from buyer deposit if invested in shares:
          Loss from other costs if invested in shares:
          Overall loss:
          Sources: Savills, Barclays Equity Gilt study, MoneyWeek


          Time to stop laughing at renters!
          I've seen much of the rest of the world. It is brutal and cruel and dark, Rome is the light.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
            Remember the shares are pre dot-com crash. They went through the roof (geddit!)

            http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7726389.stm
            Conclusion: renting is a good idea if you can invest the deposit in a boom.

            IOW if you can foretell the future, you can get rich.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Alf W View Post
              Time to start laughing at people duped by primary school level statistics.

              It forgets that the Buyer has an asset worth £76k in that example.

              Also, the Renter has turned their potential deposit (prob around £2k) into £100k in 20 years?? How so?

              Utter tosh!
              capital repaid £14,942

              25 yr mortgage, 20 year (1980 - 2000) period hardly any capital is repaid, it's almost all interest paid.

              You should get a job in investment banking!

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                Time to stop laughing at renters!
                Presumably their landlords did well during that period too? Renting is clearly a source of free money and we should base our whole economy on it.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                  Presumably their landlords did well during that period too? Renting is clearly a source of free money and we should base our whole economy on it.
                  Hey, I'm just reporting the "facts".

                  The conclusion is simple.

                  Sometimes it better to be a renter and sometimes it is better to have a mortgage and pay interest.

                  But I prefer to own property outright and pay neither.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                    Hey, I'm just reporting the "facts".

                    The conclusion is simple.

                    Sometimes it better to be a renter and sometimes it is better to have a mortgage and pay interest.

                    But I prefer to own property outright and pay neither.
                    It's better to be a renter if your rent is much less than a mortgage payment, in the short term. I have doubts about their figures and one day I might even write an app. to run through this numerically, taking inflation etc into account.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X