• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Lehman Brothers chiefs' lack of plan cost creditors $75bn

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Lehman Brothers chiefs' lack of plan cost creditors $75bn

    Lehman Brothers chiefs' lack of plan cost creditors $75bn
    Christine Seib in New York

    Dick Fuld, the ousted chairman and chief executive of Lehman Brothers, and his deputies cost creditors as much as $75 billion (£51.5 billion) by rushing the stricken investment bank into a bankruptcy filing, an analysis by liquidators has found.

    Bryan Marsal, co-chief executive of Alvarez & Marsal (A&M), which is restructuring Lehman, described the bank's unexpected collapse on September 15 as “unconscionable waste of value”. Mr Marsal's report estimates that between $50 billion and $75 billion of assets that could have been used to repay unsecured creditors were wasted because Lehman did not have a clear plan to wind down the bank.

    A&M was hired by Lehman's board at 10.30pm on September 14, hours before Lehman made the biggest bankruptcy filing in American history. The US Government had refused to bail out Lehman as it had Bear Stearns in March and Mr Fuld's pleas to rivals, including Bank of America, to buy the business had fallen on deaf ears.

    Mr Fuld had spent months assuring investors that the bank was financially sound, while turning away offers that he considered too low. In his first internal report, Mr Marsal made a series of damning accusations about the actions of top Lehman executives in the lead-up to the bank's collapse.
    Related Links

    Mr Marsal said: “This [bankruptcy]filing, which was pretty much dictated to the board of directors at Lehman that weekend, occurred with no planning. Had rules of crisis management been followed, much of the value that was lost by the unsecured creditors would have been prevented.

    “While I have no position on whether or not the Federal Government should have provided further assistance, once the decision was made not to provide it, an orderly wind-down plan should have been pursued.”

    Lehman's unsecured creditors are owed an estimated $200 billion but are expected to recover only $20 billion, ten cents on the dollar, once the restructuring is complete. A&M found that most of the loss of value had occurred because the bankruptcy filing caused the bank to default on trading contracts with counterparties, cancelling about 900,000 derivatives contracts. (AtW's comment: the management there should get 1 year jail for each such contract to be served sequentially.)

    These included contracts in which Lehman was owed money. ( ) In an orderly unwinding, at least $50 billion could have been saved, A&M found.

    Further value was destroyed when the unplanned bankruptcy forced down prices for Lehman's assets in a market already artificially depressed by the shock collapse of the bank. This meant that the trading and investment banking businesses were sold for less than $500 million although they had made about $4 billion annual profits before the bankruptcy.

    About 150 A&M liquidation experts are working at Lehman's New York, London and Hong Kong offices to ascertain what assets can be salvaged for creditors. Mr Marsal will take over as Lehman's chief executive when Mr Fuld stands down at the year-end.

    --------

    Just think of the guys who owed Lehman money via derivaties and they cancelled that - some people must have made a killing, literally!

    #2
    It all reminds me of a Dilbert cartoon from around 2001 - something like "So when the company makes money senior management deserve bonuses, but when it loses money it's due to unforeseeable market conditions?"

    Comment


      #3
      Hindsight is a wonderful thing isn't it?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by bobhope View Post
        Hindsight is a wonderful thing isn't it?
        Well, that's easy to say now...

        Comment


          #5
          Fuld could have saved the bank : he just did not like the price. What a numpty.

          Comment


            #6
            Most people hold themselves back from going after management positions because they think you need some special skills.

            Well, these episodes show the only real skill is the ability to put on a suit and talk like a twat, and just about anyone can do that.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
              Most people hold themselves back from going after management positions because they think you need some special skills.

              Well, these episodes show the only real skill is the ability to put on a suit and talk like a twat, and just about anyone can do that.
              WHS
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #8
                Dick Fuld was an egocentric and have serious personality and attitude problems - I am sure there will be a book about him but from those that worked their

                - he never liked people below a certain level to look at him in meetings
                - he was always right
                - he had the opportunity to save Lehmans upto 10 days before it went tits up but was holding out for more money - which wasnt going to come

                I wish someone would just kneecap him in the desert and put a glass of water 2 miles away and then snap his elbows and put it on Pay Per View to watch.

                Man is a disgusting example of what humans have become

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Liability View Post
                  Dick Fuld was an egocentric and have serious personality and attitude problems - I am sure there will be a book about him but from those that worked their

                  - he never liked people below a certain level to look at him in meetings
                  - he was always right
                  - he had the opportunity to save Lehmans upto 10 days before it went tits up but was holding out for more money - which wasnt going to come

                  I wish someone would just kneecap him in the desert and put a glass of water 2 miles away and then snap his elbows and put it on Pay Per View to watch.

                  Man is a disgusting example of what humans have become
                  Apparently some bloke smacked him in the company gym.

                  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/f...thers-gym.html

                  Not hard enough it seems.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Liability View Post
                    Dick Fuld was an egocentric and have serious personality and attitude problems - I am sure there will be a book about him but from those that worked their
                    Didn't he lose his commission for striking superior officers? And I heard that when Lehmans finally went bust a group of his staff gave him a proper shoeing.

                    So, as well as being able to put on a suit and talk like a twat, you need the ability to swing your fists inappropriately?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X