• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Waste not......?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Waste not......?

    Now we know what our taxes are spent on......on ourselves!!!

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    The Times

    Labour's army of consultants adds 1p to income tax
    By Jill Sherman, Tony Halpin and Tom Baldwin

    STATE spending on private consultants has soared to £2.5 billion, the equivalent of a penny in the pound on income tax, official statistics obtained by The Times reveal.
    Figures from the Office of Government Commerce show that spending on consultants rose by 42 per cent last year from £1.76 billion in 2003-04. That is as much as it would cost to build 150 new hospitals or employ more than 100,000 nurses or 75,000 policemen. A taxpayer earning £40,000 is now contributing around £87 a year to private sector companies.


    The increase comes as Whitehall tries to shed some 84,000 Civil Service jobs, and unions have complained that departments are paying more to have their work done privately — often by former civil servants. The disclosure, on the opening day of the Labour Party conference, also coincides with the revelation that Gordon Brown intends to reinstate civil servants to their pre-eminent position should he succeed Tony Blair at 10 Downing Street, reversing the Prime Minister’s reliance on political advisers.

    Some private consultancies are now focusing entirely on public sector contracts, which can attract fees of up to £2,000 per day. Firms are being hired to advise on outsourcing, to “manage change”, to set up IT systems, to advise on advertising and communications and to conduct polls and surveys.

    For example, one public relations company with close links to the Labour Party has been given almost £3 million to persuade businesses to sponsor city academies. Weber Shandwick has been hired on a three-year contract by the Department for Education and Skills to “build and develop relations between the department and business”.

    Weber Shandwick’s chief executive, Colin Byrne, is a former chief press officer for the Labour Party and worked for Peter Mandelson during the 1997 election campaign. And two senior press officers have left the Education Department to join the company in the past year.

    Other departments spending large sums with private concerns include the NHS, which spent £85 million on consultancy work last year — up 235 per cent — defence, up 77 per cent at £148 million, work and pensions, which paid out £345 million, and transport, which spent £328 million. Local government has paid consultants more than £230 million, almost four times as much as last year.

    Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services Union, said the Government planned to save £3 billion a year by slashing civil servants but was now spending almost as much on management consultants. “It is sheer lunacy and represents little value to the taxpayer, especially when you have consultants sitting opposite civil servants doing the same work but being paid up to ten times more,” he said.

    The MORI polling organisation said that its public sector contracts had accelerated since 1997 and that there had been more commmissions from Whitehall heads in the past two years, after Civil Service reforms. “Permanent secretaries have been given targets, some of which are based on improved consumer satisfaction, so more surveys are being commissioned,” a spokesman said.

    Whitehall departments, hospitals and town halls are also increasingly relying on consultants to help with the introduction of radical reforms. Hospitals are also paying external consultants to advise them on contracting out operations to the private sector.

    Douglas Johnson-Poensgen, director of Serco Consulting, said that his firm had seen a 250 per cent increase in public sector contracts in the past two years, particularly from the NHS. The Health Department’s commercial directorate, which is trying to reduce waiting lists, had spent £30 million on consultants to advise on contracts worth £4 billion, he said. The NHS is also hiring IT consultants to help with a national programme to transfer all patient records on to computers.

    The Ministry of Defence logistics department has hired consultants to help it to buy military equipment, while town halls have brought in advisers to improve customer relations, set up call centres and to save money on supplies.

    Andy Ford, head of local government consultancy at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said his firm’s public sector contracts had doubled over the past three years, particularly in local government. This was partly due to council league tables, Sir Peter Gershon’s drive to save £20 billion in the public sector and local efforts to improve frontline services.

    All work was now being done against background that existing staff would be reduced, he said. “If the goal of Whitehall is to do policy work, then why do you need to provide back office IT staff? Isn’t it better to get someone else to do it?”

    But the FDA, which represents senior civil servants, said it had repeatedly raised concerns about the use of management consultants who were often former civil servants being paid more to do the same work. “There is no accountability for the money spent,” a spokesman said. “Nobody knows how much money is spent, it often doesn’t appear in department running costs, and it is just spiralling out of control.”
    Sola gratia

    Sola fide

    Soli Deo gloria

    #2
    It makes hubby feel better to know some of his taxes are coming back to me.

    Kerching....
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

    Comment


      #3
      Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services Union, said the Government planned to save £3 billion a year by slashing civil servants but was now spending almost as much on management consultants. “It is sheer lunacy and represents little value to the taxpayer, especially when you have consultants sitting opposite civil servants doing the same work but being paid up to ten times more,” he said.
      Have to disagree there. On the whole, consultants do not do the same work as Civil Servants. The majority of Civil Servants and Public Servants do precious little work, and they usually lack any expertise (except in the drafting of policy).
      Whilst I am the first to complain about waste in the public sector, the public sector also has an obligation to deliver, which is not always the cheapest option. If the public sector lacks the in-house skills to deliver then it is obvious that external expertise needs to be contracted in as and when required.

      The real issue with consultancy in the public sector is to do with contract management. The likes of EDS are allowed to run riot and cream off public funds only because the client does not manage their engagement effectively. Consultants needs to be told exactly what their remit is, what the timeframe is, and have payment linked to clearly defined objectives.

      Comment


        #4
        Consultants needs to be told exactly what their remit is, what the timeframe is, and have payment linked to clearly defined objectives.
        No, the clearly defined objective of UK gov is to shift large sums of money from the public purse to these consultancies/party donors. Once that is understood the rest becomes a set of obvious consequences.

        The real inefficiency in their scheme is that us as independant contractors can also get at the trough, all-be-it in a quite small way.

        HTH

        Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
        threadeds website, and here's my blog.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by threaded
          No, the clearly defined objective of UK gov is to shift large sums of money from the public purse to these consultancies/party donors. Once that is understood the rest becomes a set of obvious consequences.
          They shift large amounts of public money because there is no contract management. Inviting a global consultancy to take care of business ticks a large box on the senior civil servant's performance objectives; "It's all taken care off, EDS are handling that, where's my promotion?"
          Large sums of money continue to flood into the pockets of partners because civil servants can't publicly admit that something has gone wrong and mistakes have been made. That would be professional suicide. So they pretend a project has been a success when it hasn't and the consultancy receives a glowing reference from the civil servant. Screwing up a major project is almost as good for a consultancy as delivering big time.

          Comment


            #6
            voron: Screwing up is much better for the consultancy, it is more profitable. If as a consultancy you use inexperienced people then your wage cost is much much lower, so you can put more bodies in to look good, and still the profit on the contract is higher. Most projects fail anyways and such things are outside the remit of the auditors. So in terms of scams it is a good one.

            When things in the project are obviously going downhill then the consultancy can ask for extra money for "specialist contractors" for "unforeseen circumstances" which they can cream some more off the top. The contract manager will generally get a bonus for such a thing, and when things still fail these outside consultants can be blamed.

            Hey many contractors make a good living at being the one to be blamed, so is it necessarily a bad thing that this is happening?
            Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
            threadeds website, and here's my blog.

            Comment


              #7
              I fail to see what this has got to do with Christianity - please keep the posts on topic chico.

              Comment


                #8
                Threaded, I agree with your last post. This is why we need a strong and independent audit body with the power to enforce recommendations. This is much easier with local government as there are CPA, BVPI and league table ratings that can be affected by such things. Central Government needs to feel the whip and more civil servants should be popped.

                Comment


                  #9
                  voron: But you miss my thesis: this is the system working as intended by UK gov. What you suggest would be like ramming a stick into the spokes of a bike and many independant contractors would suffer as the system is rejigged to find another way to shift money from the public purse into the pockets of party donors.
                  Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                  threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I don't see why it should affect contractors. I've never been offered a contract because a major consultancy is on the project. In fact, given proper contract management the opportunities for contractors should increase, as they offer far greater value for money.

                    I am currently trying to educate my public sector client that they have a choice: £1,000 p/d for a fresh graduate with no experience or real knoweldge through a consultancy firm, or £800 p/d for a contractor with decades of experience and expert knowledge.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X