Hidden away in the Sunday times(Bottom of page 26) was the following...
Oh, that's alright then!
Originally posted by Sunday Times
-
-
... and this fellah also said North Korea was reprocessing Plutonium in 1992.
It's taking them a long time to build a bomb and kill us all, innit?Drivelling in TPD is not a mental health issue. We're just community blogging, that's all.
Xenophon said: "CUK Geek of the Week". A gingerjedi certified "Elitist Tw@t". Posting rated @ 5 lard points -
Q. what speaks Korean and glows in the dark ?Originally posted by zeitghostFive nukes...
Use just one & see what happens next...
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Kim Jong Il will be ok, he's got his protective anorakOriginally posted by zeitghostFive nukes...
Use just one & see what happens next...
ǝןqqıʍComment
-
I have a 'lightning proof' umbrella. Will I be alright?Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostKim Jong Il will be ok, he's got his protective anorakComment
-
You should upgrade to a North Korean anorak if you want the benefit of full protection. DiscoStu Ltd will shortly be importing these and offering them to CUK members at a generous discount.Originally posted by oracleslave View PostǝןqqıʍComment
-
Hardly news - they exploded a nuclear warhead about a year or two ago.Bored.Comment
-
This doesn't mean they've actually built a warhead which is capable of hitting anything meaningful (other than Japan or China).enough material for five nuclear warheads,
It's not as simple as strapping some plutonium to the top of a missile and hitting the big red button."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Thanks for the clarification.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
Btw, just for your clarification, Nuclear warheads aren't designed to "hit" anything.Comment
Comment