• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Pissed Broadcasting Corporation

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Pissed Broadcasting Corporation

    They must have been tulipfaced when they hired that Jonathan Woss. What a pillock.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    #2
    Anyone who can get their hands on 6 million of taxpayers money is hardly a pillock.

    What does that make us?
    Older and ...well, just older!!

    Comment


      #3
      I still find it hard to take in that Ross is paid £6 million/year. £600,000 p.a. seems like gross overpayment, but it's 10 times that. Wtf. Carol Vord. was on about £1m too. Surely 60 odd K a year for the likes of them is plenty? And someone like Paxman perhaps in the mid 150k. At least C4 got things right finally when they offered Carol 'waana loan' Vord a 90% pay cut.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
        I still find it hard to take in that Ross is paid £6 million/year. £600,000 p.a. seems like gross overpayment, but it's 10 times that. Wtf. Carol Vord. was on about £1m too. Surely 60 odd K a year for the likes of them is plenty? And someone like Paxman perhaps in the mid 150k. At least C4 got things right finally when they offered Carol 'waana loan' Vord a 90% pay cut.
        It doesn’t exactly fit in with the stated aim of ‘educating and informing’ does it? I can see some value to society of the Paxmanator ripping into some slimey-arsed politician or dodgy banker. Hell, he’s funnier than Woss as well.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          Hell, he’s funnier than Woss as well.
          Agreed! It's a bit boring when what's-her-face is standing in.

          Comment


            #6
            Aren't they or their dodgy agents doing exactly what we would though?

            Negotiating the best possible rate for the job?

            It's just that the BBC is the weakest clientco out there "Certainly your demands for millions sounds fair to me, sign here!"

            Not surprised of any of it since Wogan was found to be paid £££ for doing Children in need. scandalous

            However, I wouldn't pay any of them in washers.
            'elf and safety guru

            Comment


              #7
              I think the key point is the millions spent on the top few BBC "celebs" might be better spent on new comedies, dramas and interesting topical and educational programmes, rather than Chav fodder.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                I think the key point is the millions spent on the top few BBC "celebs" might be better spent on new comedies, dramas and interesting topical and educational programmes, rather than Chav fodder.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                  Agreed! It's a bit boring when what's-her-face is standing in.
                  I assume you mean Kirsty SQUAWK! Yes she is annoying.

                  Emily Maitlis however is YUMMERLICIOUS

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                    I think the key point is the millions spent on the top few BBC "celebs" might be better spent on new comedies, dramas and interesting topical and educational programmes, rather than Chav fodder.
                    Or a reduction in the licence fee?

                    'elf and safety guru

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X