• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Mortgage deals 'should be capped', says Sir John Gieve

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Mortgage deals 'should be capped', says Sir John Gieve

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/n...ohn-Gieve.html

    Mortgage deals 'should be capped', says Sir John Gieve
    The Government should consider imposing caps on the amount mortgage companies can lend to homebuyers, the Bank of England's deputy governor has said.

    Sir John Gieve used his final speech before stepping down to indicate that the authorities must consider imposing more direct controls on the amount banks can lend to their customers. This might include caps on the loan-to-income and loan-to-value ratios - the key metrics banks use to work out whether to lend to prospective buyers.

    He said: "In theory, a ceiling on these ratios could have provided an effective brake on the excesses of the last boom.

    "If problems are concentrated within the property market then caps on loan-to-income and loan-to-value ratios might be effective."

    Sir John, who is to be succeeded by Paul Tucker at the end of this month, has also supported plans to emulate Spain's financial regulation system. He acknowledged that the Bank could have set interest rates more appropriately in the decade before the financial crisis, saying: "the large and co-ordinated cut in interest rates at the start of this decade almost certainly contributed to the build-up of an ever larger bubble."

    He also warned that the UK faced a risk of slipping into a Japan-style decade of deflation and stagnation in the coming years, and said that the Bank was currently wrestling over the question of how low interest rates could feasibly go. He said: "one issue is... how close you get to zero, whether 1 or 0.5[pc]."

    But given his concentration on financial stability, it is his comments on controls for mortgages that will attract most attention.

    Few policymakers have called for direct controls on bank lending, although many have raised concerns about the fact that, during the peak of the housing bubble, banks were willing to lend significantly more in comparison to borrowers' incomes or home value than in previous years.

    Most notorious of all was Northern Rock's Together mortgage, which lent borrowers up to 125pc of the value of their homes, ensuring they would be in instant negative equity from the moment they took it out.

    =================


    #2
    Sir John Gieve should just shut up and go quietly to be honest, he has failed abysmally in his role to prevent this mess.
    If he had concerns he should have voiced them about 3 years ago.

    Comment


      #3
      <
      The Government should consider imposing caps on the amount mortgage companies can lend to homebuyers
      >

      I thought that this was about zero at the moment, so not much need for capping.
      If you find this post offensive, please insert "Chan" before and "tho" after, then it should be OK.

      Sometimes I almost feel just like a human being - Elvis Costello

      Comment


        #4
        He should have said this circa 2004, any idiot can make this advice now
        The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

        But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by GreenerGrass View Post
          Sir John Gieve should just shut up and go quietly to be honest, he has failed abysmally in his role to prevent this mess.
          If he had concerns he should have voiced them about 3 years ago.
          WHS

          Quite a few of the so called experts have been using the line 'if only the government had given us the powers to prevent this'

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by GreenerGrass View Post
            Sir John Gieve should just shut up and go quietly to be honest, he has failed abysmally in his role to prevent this mess.
            If he had concerns he should have voiced them about 3 years ago.
            Why.

            Don't you learn by your mistakes in your job and do a better job next year because of it?

            I happen to think that what he says now is right, ignoring it becaue he didn't say it five years ago would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater

            tim

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by tim123 View Post
              Why.

              Don't you learn by your mistakes in your job and do a better job next year because of it?

              I happen to think that what he says now is right, ignoring it becaue he didn't say it five years ago would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater

              tim
              This guy is/was one of the people on the MPC and so is supposed to be an expert in his field. My grandmother, who is not exactly playing with a full deck these days, said it would end in tears because people were borrowing too much money and the banks were too greedy at least 4 years ago - and if she could see it this idiot should have, and more importantly done something about it.

              The truth is probably that he had a vested interest so he said nothing.

              As others have said - good riddance.
              Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

              Comment


                #8
                The truth is probably that he had a vested interest so he said nothing.


                was getting a big fat bonus for letting banks continue to lend money to people who would never be able to pay it back

                this problem has been caused by greed and so yes those that could have prevented it but did not should hang from the nearest lamppost

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by original PM View Post


                  was getting a big fat bonus for letting banks continue to lend money to people who would never be able to pay it back

                  this problem has been caused by greed and so yes those that could have prevented it but did not should hang from the nearest lamppost
                  I believe that was I said?
                  Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I'm sure there used to be a cap. However this was removed in the early years of the nu-lab balls up...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X