• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Managers are tulip

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Managers are tulip

    OK, maybe it’s a bit of a mad generalisation to say they're all tulip, but I’ve met the whole gamut of toxic managers from control freaks through nice-but-dim to complete bullying psychopaths, and I can really only count the good IT or project managers I’ve met on the fingers of one hand; there are 5 managers I’ve worked with that I would say are really effective, and they all had the following attributes;
    - solid technical and/or domain knowledge
    - ability to listen to professional advice and act on it, as opposed to just looking at costs
    - plain language
    - keep it simple; no big MS Project charts, KPIs, dashboards or any of those tools for the witless, but a white board and a sheet of A4 paper to communicate the plan
    - know how to distill the problem down to it’s essentials to avoid scope creep
    - make it clear what is expected of people, and show the same behaviour themselves
    - give credit to others when success is achieved
    - share responsibility and learn the lessons from failure without apportioning individual blame
    - prepared to challenge and when necessary confront their seniors instead of bumlicking
    - select expert people and give them freedom to act instead of micro managing

    Any other capabilities that spring to mind?
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    #2
    a good sense of humour is also a huge asset.

    Comment


      #3
      The problem here is that without some of the negative aspects you have mentioned - they wouldn't be managers
      Who has time? Who has time? But then if we do not ever take time, how can we ever have time?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        Any other capabilities that spring to mind?
        Not have their hormones controlled by a monthly cycle

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by minestrone View Post
          Not have their hormones controlled by a monthly cycle
          That's vicious. Let's face it, male managers can be quasi-fascist criminally insane dickheads too; look at those scumbags that drove RBS, HBOS, Lehman et al into the ground while their own staff were warning them of what would happen.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #6
            Maybe it's you.

            Perhaps you aren't a team player, but some wayward techie?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
              Maybe it's you.

              Perhaps you aren't a team player, but some wayward techie?
              Maybe I’m not really the team type, no. I prefer to get hold of a big complicated issue and work through it bit by bit on my own, calling in people to help where needed. I don’t think this ‘teamwork’ idea is always the best way to do things; sometimes you need a clever, highly trained individual who can take an independent look at things, instead of general agreement among all and sundry.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                Maybe I’m not really the team type, no. I prefer to get hold of a big complicated issue and work through it bit by bit on my own, calling in people to help where needed. I don’t think this ‘teamwork’ idea is always the best way to do things; sometimes you need a clever, highly trained individual who can take an independent look at things, instead of general agreement among all and sundry.
                Totally agree. This team playing thing only works if the team works as a team. Normally the term "team player" is only used to take a pop at someone.

                He/She is not a great team player.

                Whereas if you are a good team player is goes unnoticed. Sometimes the team can hold back the one individual who just needs some alone time to think things through and then hand back the conclusion to the rest of the team who accept their learned colleagues assessment rather than nitpick and stall unnecessarily.
                Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                  Not have their hormones controlled by a monthly cycle
                  You were tolling Churchill about his religious beliefs yesterday. Now this. Take a holiday, seriously.
                  Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Do you ever stop bitching?
                    Me, me, me...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X