One of the most efficient ways of paying yourself through a limited company is with a small salary and high dividends. This is because paying dividends reduces the National Insurance contributions that need to be made for PAYE salary.
When a company issues shares, all shares within the same class must receive the same dividends. However, if a company sets up different classes of share then the dividends only need to equal within the share class.
My question is: what is there to prevent companies setting up a different share class for each of their employees and paying all employees a 'salary' via dividends to avoid National Insurance?
If the principle works for a one man contractor outfit, why can it not be extended to a small company with 5 directors/employees or to a big company with 10,000 employees?
Any ideas? I'm sure there must be a reason why this doesn't work.
When a company issues shares, all shares within the same class must receive the same dividends. However, if a company sets up different classes of share then the dividends only need to equal within the share class.
My question is: what is there to prevent companies setting up a different share class for each of their employees and paying all employees a 'salary' via dividends to avoid National Insurance?
If the principle works for a one man contractor outfit, why can it not be extended to a small company with 5 directors/employees or to a big company with 10,000 employees?
Any ideas? I'm sure there must be a reason why this doesn't work.
Comment