• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

More doom ....

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    More doom ....

    More doom predicted before a slow fragile recovery.

    "We face another 12 to 18 months of serious grief. Around 900,000 jobs will be lost this year and half a million next"

    #2
    Originally posted by denver2k View Post
    More doom predicted before a slow fragile recovery.

    "We face another 12 to 18 months of serious grief. Around 900,000 jobs will be lost this year and half a million next"
    This is what I have said since November last year. Anyone who thinks any different just has not been impacted yet. "The Great Depression" took three years to hit bottom, then people borrowed money to buy share that turned out to be worth a lot less than they paid. This time people borrowed money to buy houses that turned out to be worth a lot less than they paid.
    Fiscal nomad it's legal.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by alreadypacked View Post
      This is what I have said since November last year. Anyone who thinks any different just has not been impacted yet. "The Great Depression" took three years to hit bottom, then people borrowed money to buy share that turned out to be worth a lot less than they paid. This time people borrowed money to buy houses that turned out to be worth a lot less than they paid.
      Is that the short or long term view?
      Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by alreadypacked View Post
        This time people borrowed money to buy houses that turned out to be worth a lot less than they paid.
        They should have drunk their money away instead. As much as a great burgundy can ruin your bank account, the bailiffs can't take it back once you've drunk it.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by alreadypacked View Post
          This is what I have said since November last year. Anyone who thinks any different just has not been impacted yet. "The Great Depression" took three years to hit bottom, then people borrowed money to buy share that turned out to be worth a lot less than they paid. This time people borrowed money to buy houses that turned out to be worth a lot less than they paid.
          And anyone who thinks that everyone is going to be impacted simply doesn't understand economics. There are and there will be sectors that do ok, and some that do very well. Typical example, I have a friend who basically makes sweets (chocolates...she actually calls herself a "chocolateer"!). She says she has never been busier because people now treat themselves to her products and use them as a "pick-me-up".

          I wish I could do it as a plan C (already have a plan B). Problem is, I would eat all my stock
          Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
            And anyone who thinks that everyone is going to be impacted simply doesn't understand economics. There are and there will be sectors that do ok, and some that do very well. Typical example, I have a friend who basically makes sweets (chocolates...she actually calls herself a "chocolateer"!). She says she has never been busier because people now treat themselves to her products and use them as a "pick-me-up".

            I wish I could do it as a plan C (already have a plan B). Problem is, I would eat all my stock
            I believe baliffs are also doing well.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
              And anyone who thinks that everyone is going to be impacted simply doesn't understand economics. There are and there will be sectors that do ok, and some that do very well.
              What I mean is there are some people that are yet to be impacted, not everyone will be, but more will be. We are not at the bottom yet.
              Fiscal nomad it's legal.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
                She says she has never been busier because people now treat themselves to her products and use them as a "pick-me-up".
                Is it because ppl dont have enough money to buy chocolates from Thorntons etc, they buy cheap chocolates from your friend's place (thus more sales).

                Comment


                  #9
                  If it's handled right, everyone will be affected. Saver, borrowers, rich and poor. All except the banks of course, who will do very nicely and are probably raking it in already.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by denver2k View Post
                    Is it because ppl dont have enough money to buy chocolates from Thorntons etc, they buy cheap chocolates from your friend's place (thus more sales).

                    Undoubtedly. She is cheaper than Thorntons, but then she doesn't have the overheads they do. And I would actually take her stuff over Thorntons anyway - some of her stuff is virtually a work of art.

                    .....right up to the point it gets stuffed in someone's mouth that is. Then it tends to lose it's aesthetic appeal

                    Actually you make a very interesting point.....it will be interesting to see if a company like Thorntons survives this part of the economic cycle.
                    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X