• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Heiress bids to cut ex-husband out of £100m fortune

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Heiress bids to cut ex-husband out of £100m fortune

    Heiress bids to cut ex-husband out of £100m fortune in landmark test of Britain's pre-nuptial laws

    The heiress' ex-husband Nicolas Granatino has hired divorce lawyers Fiona Shackleton (left) and Nicholas Mostyn QC, the legal team which represented Sir Paul McCartney in his divorce from Heather Mills

    One of Germany's richest women is taking her ex-husband to court to enforce a pre-nuptial agreement that would leave him without a penny of her £100million fortune.

    Katrin Radmacher, a paper industry heiress, claims her former investment banker husband has not honoured the pre-nuptial deal they signed in 1998.

    The landmark legal case will determine if the agreement, which was signed in Germany, is valid in the English courts and pave the way for pre-nuptial contracts to become legally binding here.

    Ms Radmacher, 39, accused Nicolas Granatino, who is a French national with whom she has two young children, of trying to cash in on her family's wealth.

    An earlier High Court hearing ignored her pleas and awarded 38-year-old Mr Granatino a lump sum of £5.6million.

    The couple met in Tramp members' nightclub and married in Britain in November 1998, setting up home in South Kensington.

    A few months earlier they signed a pre-nuptial agreement, recognised in both Germany and France, in which they agreed neither would make a financial claim against the other.

    However, it is because they married in this country that the case could be heard here.

    When they married, Mr Granatino was a banker with JP Morgan earning as much as £324,000 a year while his wife was running a fashion boutique with her sister in Knightsbridge.

    In 2003, he quit his job to pursue a doctorate in biotechnology at Oxford, the move coinciding with the breakdown in their marriage.

    They separated in 2006, by which time Mr Granatino was earning as little as £30,000 a year. Ms Radmacher has accused him of deliberately delaying his doctorate to 'maximise his claim'.

    She believes that if he 'wishes to be an academic he must live as such', rather than enjoy a millionaire's lifestyle funded by her.

    But at a hearing in the High Court in July, judge Mrs Justice Baron ruled that it would be 'manifestly unfair' to hold Mr Granatino to the pre-nuptial contract and ordered Ms Radmacher to pay her ex-husband £5.6million one-off compensation.

    Mr Granatino had been demanding just over £9million.

    Ms Radmacher, who has since returned to Dusseldorf where the children go to school, will go to the Court of Appeal next week to overturn that ruling in a case that has cost more than £1.1million in legal fees.

    Mr Granatino has hired divorce lawyers Fiona Shackleton and Nicholas Mostyn QC, the legal team which represented Sir Paul McCartney in his divorce from Heather Mills.

    Divorce lawyers are watching the case with interest. London has enjoyed a recent boom in divorce cases, prompted in part by the number of wealthy couples who choose to live here and a string of landmark hearings that have made it favourable for poorer spouses to receive huge pay-outs.

    Most experts believe that Ms Radmacher is unlikely to succeed in the case.

    Julian Lipson, head of the family law department at Withers law firm, said today: 'The English courts pride themselves on protecting the financially weaker party and that will over-ride the argument that the financially weaker spouse knew what they were signing and should be held to the bargain, even if it is a bad one.'



    gold diggers

    Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...tial-laws.html

    #2
    pre-nuptial agreements are no very romantic.

    If you need one : why bother getting married?

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
      pre-nuptial agreements are no very romantic.
      Indeed - that's why there should be maximum payouts set by law, any money made before marriage should be offlimits completely.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        Indeed - that's why there should be maximum payouts set by law, any money made before marriage should be offlimits completely.
        I disagree. Marriage should be for life.

        We need an education program to warn people about the dangers of marriage. Maybe we could have government sponsored f4j superhero protests?



        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
          I disagree. Marriage should be for life.

          We need an education program to warn people about the dangers of marriage. Maybe we could have government sponsored f4j superhero protests?



          Yep but these are not Brits. They are divorce-court tourists



          (\__/)
          (>'.'<)
          ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
            Yep but these are not Brits. They are divorce-court tourists



            British Courts are global leaders in giving maximum in divorce to women : its a great British money earner!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
              Yep but these are not Brits. They are divorce-court tourists

              It's the only industry we have left
              Originally posted by cailin maith
              Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar??

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by FSM with Cheddar View Post
                It's the only industry we have left
                Totally unfair : stop putting the UK down.

                We also are world leaders in chav production.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                  I disagree. Marriage should be for life.
                  Indeed - so we need legal safeguards to prevent the temptation and also make divorce less attractive.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by AtW View Post
                    Indeed - so we need legal safeguards to prevent the temptation and also make divorce less attractive.
                    I think the family courts have given men good reasons to put them off getting divorced.

                    If they could just do the same for women.....

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X