Conspiracy Theorists ...

[sasguru]

... are usually thick and/or have poor judgement.

A rudimentary appreciation, understanding and experience of the world and a knowledge of history would tell you that conspiracies cannot be sustained indefinitely.

And sometimes the conspiracy is so much "harder" to engineer than reality, that believing in one is obviously pants.

Take for example the "Man didn't land on the moon" loonies. This is a classic case of the fact that it is easier to land on the moon (which really only requires a knowledge of Newtonian mechanics and solutions to some practical engineering problems) than to create the impression that man landed on the moon and then sustain that untruth for decades.

[HairyArsedBloke]

Er, wot!?


You're missing Atw.

[sasguru]

You're missing Atw.

certainly not.

[realityhack]

You so are.

You're like Blofeld without a Bond.

Or Baron Greenback without Dangermouse.

[sasguru]

You so are.

You're like Blofeld without a Bond.

Be careful. I have the ability to cause AtW to come back.

[NickNick]

You;ll love this lot then
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/

especially
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum...&topic=28451.0

[DaveB]

Be careful. I have the ability to cause AtW to come back.

Just close your eyes and say his name out load three times

[Bagpuss]

Maybe Maddy Landed on the moon?

[Rookie]

... Take for example the "Man didn't land on the moon" loonies. This is a classic case of the fact that it is easier to land on the moon (which really only requires a knowledge of Newtonian mechanics and solutions to some practical engineering problems) than to create the impression that man landed on the moon and then sustain that untruth for decades.

Easier to land men on the moon than to create and maintain a sham? Really sas?

[realityhack]

Be careful. I have the ability to cause AtW to come back.

Away and stroke your white hairy caterpillar, Silas.