- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thomas Cook to go under
Collapse
X
-
Thomas Cook to go under
Speaking gibberish on internet talkboards since last Michaelmas. Plus here on Twitter -
Originally posted by MrMark View PostIs God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus -
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostCurious. Given that the report specifically points out that Arcandor's troubles are not expected to affect Thomas Cook....how do you equate that with "Thomas Cook to go under"?
HTH.Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith
Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek
That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay
Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - CyberghoulComment
-
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostCurious. Given that the report specifically points out that Arcandor's troubles are not expected to affect Thomas Cook....how do you equate that with "Thomas Cook to go under"?Comment
-
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostCurious. Given that the report specifically points out that Arcandor's troubles are not expected to affect Thomas Cook....how do you equate that with "Thomas Cook to go under"?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by PM-Junkie View PostCurious. Given that the report specifically points out that Arcandor's troubles are not expected to affect Thomas Cook....how do you equate that with "Thomas Cook to go under"?Speaking gibberish on internet talkboards since last Michaelmas. Plus here on TwitterComment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostGolden Tulip hotels
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment