• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Baby P's Killers' Identity Legally Disclosed

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Baby P's Killers' Identity Legally Disclosed

    You could find out who they were if you looked for it, but now they no longer have the protection of an anonymity order:


    #2
    Hooray, now comes the bandwagon to incite violence and vigilante justice.

    Nice photos of them though.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #3
      Couple behind Baby P death named

      The couple responsible for the death of Baby Peter have been named after a court anonymity order expired.

      The child died at the hands of mother Tracey Connelly and her partner Steven Barker, of Penshurst Road, Haringey.

      The third defendant in the case has also now been named as Jason Owen, 37, Barker's brother. Baby Peter's surname, Connelly, has also been released.

      In May Connelly, 28, and Barker, 33, were jailed for five and 12 years for causing or allowing the death of Peter.

      The 17-month old baby had more 50 injuries when he died, including fractured ribs and a broken back.

      It emerged Owen changed his name to avoid being connected to the killing of Peter.

      Owen, 37, who was imprisoned for three years, was staying at the home in Tottenham, north London, with his 15-year-old lover.

      It has also been revealed that the brothers were charged with assaulting their own grandmother, Hilda Barker, in 1995, in an attempt to make her change her will.

      That case was dropped when Mrs Barker, 82, died before giving evidence, but she told police she had been locked in a wardrobe by the pair.


      The notoriety of the Baby Peter case is such that all three convicted are likely to be given new identities upon release to protect them from vigilante attacks, according to the probation union Napo.

      Possible appeal

      Assistant general secretary Harry Fletcher said: "The question will be, how well known are they in five years' time?

      "And will Baby P still resonate with the public in terms of horrendous crime?

      "If it does - and I suspect it will - the probation service and police will have no choice but to put in place a protection plan."

      The culprits are thought to be planning an appeal against their sentences.

      It can also be reported that Baby Peter had four siblings.

      A judge had ordered none of the defendants be named because the other children were still being re-homed.

      Now that all four children are being cared for, the guilty trio's anonymity has ceased.
      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
      Hooray, now comes the bandwagon to incite violence and vigilante justice.

      Nice photos of them though.
      Lynching would be too good for them.

      Comment


        #4
        As a firm supporter of the death penalty , drop them in an industrial sized version of the "Mighty mincer" (As advertised by the late and great Bill Mays) , comes complete with "Choppy" the one hit food slicer , which , in an industrial size , could also be used to cause severe pain and discomfort before any mincing was done.

        My plan B is to design government "human disposal" systems by the way, pitch would go something like "Are you fed up with death products that just dont work , tired of fiddly leathal injections , frustrated by time consuming electric chairs , then you need Vatomatic...etc..etc ..."
        Last edited by motoukenin; 11 August 2009, 02:58.
        Warning unicorn meat may give you hallucinations

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by motoukenin View Post
          As a firm supporter of the death penalty , drop them in an industrial sized version of the "Mighty mincer" (As advertised by the late and great Bill Mays) , comes complete with "Choppy" the one hit food slicer , which , in an industrial size , could also be used to cause severe pain and discomfort before any mincing was done.

          My plan B is to design government "human disposal" systems by the way, pitch would go something like "Are you fed up with death products that just dont work , tired of fiddly leathal injections , frustrated by time consuming electric chairs , then you need Vatomatic...etc..etc ..."
          Nope....just lock them in a room with no windows and no lights, and play max bygraves records permanently as they slowly go mad and starve to death.
          Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
            Nope....just lock them in a room with no windows and no lights, and play max bygraves records permanently as they slowly go mad and starve to death.
            Christ you are an evil ****er.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by d000hg View Post
              Hooray, now comes the bandwagon to incite violence and vigilante justice.

              Nice photos of them though.


              So what would you suggest ? A round the world cruise for them ?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by foritisme View Post
                So what would you suggest ? A round the world cruise for them ?
                I dont believe physical violence is a good solution. There are better ways of upsetting people. See the Max Bygraves post above.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                  I dont believe physical violence is a good solution. There are better ways of upsetting people. See the Max Bygraves post above.

                  So lets just say someone (a family member) managed to get hold of that bloke and do him some serious harm, do you think they would get convicted by a jury ?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Sterilisation.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X