• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Look in the Mirror and get arrested under secrets act

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Look in the Mirror and get arrested under secrets act

    Oh dear. Can't talk about this. Sorry officer, give me two minutes to finish typing this. And they tried to push it under the carpet using the official secrets act. Very naughty.

    PRESIDENT Bush planned to bomb Arab TV station al-Jazeera in friendly Qatar

    PRESIDENT Bush planned to bomb Arab TV station al-Jazeera in friendly Qatar, a "Top Secret" No 10 memo reveals.

    But he was talked out of it at a White House summit by Tony Blair, who said it would provoke a worldwide backlash.

    A source said: "There's no doubt what Bush wanted, and no doubt Blair didn't want him to do it." Al-Jazeera is accused by the US of fuelling the Iraqi insurgency.

    The attack would have led to a massacre of innocents on the territory of a key ally, enraged the Middle East and almost certainly have sparked bloody retaliation.

    A source said last night: "The memo is explosive and hugely damaging to Bush.

    Advertisement
    Falk AdSolution

    "He made clear he wanted to bomb al-Jazeera in Qatar and elsewhere. Blair replied that would cause a big problem.

    "There's no doubt what Bush wanted to do - and no doubt Blair didn't want him to do it."

    A Government official suggested that the Bush threat had been "humorous, not serious".

    But another source declared: "Bush was deadly serious, as was Blair. That much is absolutely clear from the language used by both men."

    Yesterday former Labour Defence Minister Peter Kilfoyle challenged Downing Street to publish the five-page transcript of the two leaders' conversation. He said: "It's frightening to think that such a powerful man as Bush can propose such cavalier actions.

    "I hope the Prime Minister insists this memo be published. It gives an insight into the mindset of those who were the architects of war."

    Bush disclosed his plan to target al-Jazeera, a civilian station with a huge Mid-East following, at a White House face-to-face with Mr Blair on April 16 last year.

    At the time, the US was launching an all-out assault on insurgents in the Iraqi town of Fallujah.

    Al-Jazeera infuriated Washington and London by reporting from behind rebel lines and broadcasting pictures of dead soldiers, private contractors and Iraqi victims.

    The station, watched by millions, has also been used by bin Laden and al-Qaeda to broadcast atrocities and to threaten the West.

    Al-Jazeera's HQ is in the business district of Qatar's capital, Doha.

    Its single-storey buildings would have made an easy target for bombers. As it is sited away from residential areas, and more than 10 miles from the US's desert base in Qatar, there would have been no danger of "collateral damage".

    Dozens of al-Jazeera staff at the HQ are not, as many believe, Islamic fanatics. Instead, most are respected and highly trained technicians and journalists.

    To have wiped them out would have been equivalent to bombing the BBC in London and the most spectacular foreign policy disaster since the Iraq War itself.

    The No 10 memo now raises fresh doubts over US claims that previous attacks against al-Jazeera staff were military errors.

    In 2001 the station's Kabul office was knocked out by two "smart" bombs. In 2003, al-Jazeera reporter Tareq Ayyoub was killed in a US missile strike on the station's Baghdad centre.

    The memo, which also included details of troop deployments, turned up in May last year at the Northampton constituency office of then Labour MP Tony Clarke.

    Cabinet Office civil servant David Keogh, 49, is accused under the Official Secrets Act of passing it to Leo O'Connor, 42, who used to work for Mr Clarke. Both are bailed to appear at Bow Street court next week.

    Mr Clarke, who lost at the election, returned the memo to No 10.

    He said Mr O'Connor had behaved "perfectly correctly".

    Neither Mr O'Connor or Mr Keogh were available. No 10 did not comment.
    No line up with your hands on your head. You are not allowed to know about such things.

    #2
    Originally posted by datestamp
    Oh dear. Can't talk about this. Sorry officer, give me two minutes to finish typing this. And they tried to push it under the carpet using the official secrets act. Very naughty.

    PRESIDENT Bush planned to bomb Arab TV station al-Jazeera in friendly Qatar



    No line up with your hands on your head. You are not allowed to know about such things.

    More quoted Drivel?

    Comment


      #3
      Yes Phoenix, I'm afraid that as I'm not a journalist, then most news is "quoted". Interesting concept.

      Comment


        #4
        Oh sorry, and a few more "quotes":
        http://news.inq7.net/breaking/index....story_id=57395

        It was interesting how Channel 4 news carried the story, confirmed that the Official Secrets Act had been used to block the release of futher info, that the Mirror had given an undertaking not to continue with the story, and that Channel 4 themselves had futher info (from the Independent I think) that they could quote, but which would bring down the wrath of the legal system.

        Other than that just "quotes"

        Comment


          #5
          Hands up anyone who believes it

          Anyone at all.
          Why not?

          Comment


            #6
            Where's Bovvered when you need him?

            Comment


              #7
              Shhh. Don't say anything.

              http://www.channel4.com/news/special...ge.jsp?id=1198

              Comment


                #8
                A Government official suggested that the Bush threat had been "humorous, not serious".

                But another source declared: "Bush was deadly serious, as was Blair. That much is absolutely clear from the language used by both men."
                He said...she said...what a f*cken joke

                Mailman

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by datestamp

                  Just keep surfing for interesting story's in the press...
                  Cut and paste someone elses opinion....It makes you sound more inteligent than you really are

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I'm afraid Phoenix that this is what we are reduced to. If i had personal inside knowledge of the documents, I couldn't reveal them. All we are left with is a few links to prove that this ever incurred the wrath of the authorities.

                    If you have no interest in the powers being used to suppress world news, then that's fine. I understand you have more important matters to blather on about, like George Best. Don't let me detain you. Bye

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X