Backlash starting?

[Dundeegeorge]

So what does the panel think about the catholic church restating that perverts, whoops, excuse me, practising homosexuals will not become priests, until they've proved they can control their vile inclinations for a period of 3 years?
In conjunction with the growing split in the anglican churches reported last week on this issue, is it time for the backlash?
I ask specifically because NL seem to think it's a good idea to let the degenerates marry, and if NL think it's a good idea.........

[Francko]

So what does the panel think about the catholic church restating that perverts, whoops, excuse me, practising homosexuals will not become priests, until they've proved they can control their vile inclinations for a period of 3 years?
In conjunction with the growing split in the anglican churches reported last week on this issue, is it time for the backlash?
I ask specifically because NL seem to think it's a good idea to let the degenerates marry, and if NL think it's a good idea.........

What's a perversion George? Please, specify.

[Dundeegeorge]

Certainly my little European friend

What's a perversion George? Please, specify.

Anything that I do is normal sex, anything else is perversion.
Same-sex or not-same-species is unnatural sex.

[Francko]

Same-sex or not-same-species is unnatural sex.

Animals don't seem to share your vision a few times.

Are you saying that they go against nature?

Btw, has Scotland pulled out of Europe?

[Dundeegeorge]

?

Animals don't seem to share your vision a few times.

Are you saying that they go against nature?

Btw, has Scotland pulled out of Europe?

I bow to your superior knowledge of animal sex!!!!!!!
I am indeed saying that they go against nature. If you're referring to domination activity in higher primates, that's not actually a sexual function.
Scotland pulled out of Europe? Don't understand that one at all.
Not that it would concern me anyway as I haven't lived in Scotland for a good (appropriate) many years.

What is it with you people. A few months ago this post would have caused a torrent of responses, don't you care any more?

(DG in utterly bored mode)

[Bagpuss]

Everyone has gone to CCnet, this site is boring and dieing faster than the Dodo

[xoggoth]

I believe they should be allowed to marry. People's sexuality is nobody else's business and I see no reason why gays not should be able to celibrate or cement their union as they see fit.

I have to observe that as far as I can see gays harm nobody whatever which is more than one can say for religion.

PS No I am not gay
PPS Tried it, didnt like it much

Whats all this "not natural" rubbish. Irelevant. Almost nothing man does is natural. Driving cars or eating frozen dinners is not natural. Why single out sex? Where did we ever arrive at this idea that there is anything implicitly wrong with sex at all?

[DimPrawn]

Too many intellectual lightweights here.

I don't bother much with CUK these days, instead I read the Sun.

[planetit]

So what does the panel think about the catholic church restating that perverts, whoops, excuse me, practising homosexuals will not become priests, until they've proved they can control their vile inclinations for a period of 3 years?

As I understand it a heterosexual man who has been married to a woman must prove he can control his vile inclinations before he can become a priest.

Odd group the Catholic Church.

[Chico]

PS No I am not gay
PPS Tried it, didnt like it much

Ladies and gentlemen we have a Portilloesque confession!!!