• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Teletext News RIP

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Teletext News RIP

    Teletext news on telly was to be turned off in Jan 2010 - 2 years ahead of schedule, but apparently they already killed it off yesterday.
    This default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernames

    #2
    My first programming job involved writing software in Forth for Teletext transmission systems.

    The Teletext Level 1 spec (lacking its diagrams) is at archive.org, or there's Word and Postscript versions at Imperial College. Who could fail to be moved by such classic lines as:
    The bit signalling rate is 6.9375 Mbits/s (±25 parts per million). It is 444 times the nominal television line frequency.

    or:
    The fourth and fifth Byte of every Data-Line, and a further eight Bytes of the Page-Header Data Lines, are Hamming Codes containing four 'message' bits as listed in table 1a. The bits are transmitted in numerical order from b1 to b8.

    Comment


      #3
      Anybody care to predict the turn-off date of The Internet (as we know it)?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
        Anybody care to predict the turn-off date of The Internet (as we know it)?
        The digital one or the analogue one?
        My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

        Comment


          #5
          I worked on the software for Prestel, which was identical presentation technology. State of the art for the masses before the interweb got going. I say masses, but not many people had it.

          The marketing for the Italian version at the time said that porn was the most popular usage, but I never figured out how that worked on a 40x25 character-based screen. Perhaps that's why they've turned off teletext.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
            The marketing for the Italian version at the time said that porn was the most popular usage, but I never figured out how that worked on a 40x25 character-based screen.
            You never downloaded & viewed porn on a CGA monitor, then? All it took was a bit of imagination.
            My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
              You never downloaded & viewed porn on a CGA monitor, then? All it took was a bit of imagination.
              CGA was 320*200 in four colour mode and 640*200 monochrome, which is obviously somewhat better than the Teletext/Prestel 80*72 graphics.

              Then again, we had test data including some really cool pages from a Californian cable station which had a designer who had become a whizz with Teletext graphics - a particularly good picture of an elephant sticks in the mind

              Level 5 Teletext allowed for high quality graphics, but I don't think it was ever implemented outside the lab. The equivalent spec for Prestel was trialled as Picture Prestel: the company I worked at created the transmission systems and editing terminals for that. The editing system used a Torch (basically a reboxed BBC Micro with a Z80 second processor hanging off The Tube) with a custom decoder card attached.

              Comment

              Working...
              X