• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Tax

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Tax

    How have we reached a situation where a majority find it justifiable to take, by force, more than 40%, and indeed in some cases more than 50% of other people’s incomes?

    At what level is tax no longer an instrument of a democracy but an instrument of a kleptocracy?
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    #2
    The point at which most people think it is kleptocracy, is when their earning are taxed at 50%.
    Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      How have we reached a situation where a majority find it justifiable to take, by force, more than 40%, and indeed in some cases more than 50% of other people’s incomes?

      At what level is tax no longer an instrument of a democracy but an instrument of a kleptocracy?
      The history of Taxation makes a very interesting read (now there's a phrase I never thought I'd say).

      Today, we are paying the price for the goverment's and banks' blunders, and soon 50% taxation might in fact seem to have been a good deal. I can imagine a UK where we pay 70% taxation, and still get very little in return.

      http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/18022010/325...arply-jan.html

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        How have we reached a situation where a majority find it justifiable to take, by force, more than 40%, and indeed in some cases more than 50% of other people’s incomes?

        At what level is tax no longer an instrument of a democracy but an instrument of a kleptocracy?
        kleptocracy might be the wrong term, may I suggest incompetentocracy
        Coffee's for closers

        Comment


          #5
          Kleptocracy is having to pay full and incredibly high council tax when you've got no income

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            How have we reached a situation where a majority find it justifiable to take, by force, more than 40%, and indeed in some cases more than 50% of other people’s incomes?

            At what level is tax no longer an instrument of a democracy but an instrument of a kleptocracy?
            I do not see a a complete difference between democracy and anything else in the question of whether the tax rate is 30%, 40%, 50%, or 60%. They are just different tax rates, some more taxing than others. It's like the old tale of the philosophy professor (or Churchill or GBS or whoever) asking the woman if she would sleep with him for a million pounds, and being told, Yes.
            - Would you do it for one pound?
            - What kind of woman do you think I am?
            - We've already established that, I'm just trying to fix the price.

            Well, we've more or less let the income tax become acceptable. In that case, we are just trying to fix the price.

            Do you believe that there is a point at which the rate becomes such as to alter the type of action that the tax constitutes, or the type of government that is doing it?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post
              I can imagine a UK where we pay 70% taxation, and still get very little in return.

              http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/18022010/325...arply-jan.html
              It's been done before...
              "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
              - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                Kleptocracy is having to pay full and incredibly high council tax when you've got no income
                Or having to pay 75% if you live alone as the family of 5 next door.

                Wasn't there a British Prime Minister who came up with a much fairer system of paying for local council services? What was her name?
                Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post
                  The history of Taxation makes a very interesting read (now there's a phrase I never thought I'd say).

                  Today, we are paying the price for the goverment's and banks' blunders, and soon 50% taxation might in fact seem to have been a good deal. I can imagine a UK where we pay 70% taxation, and still get very little in return.

                  http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/18022010/325...arply-jan.html
                  In Holland we have a top rate of tax at 52% for people earning more than 54,000 euros. That’s a lot of people, very few of whom actually pay it, because there is still mortgage interest tax relief. Also, many people bring their taxable income down by working partly or wholly from their own business. Others who don’t have these options open maximize non-taxable income by giving untaxed gifts to their kids. Those without kids and no other options to lower their tax burden just start working less hours. Holland has a huge part time workforce; many people actually choose to accept a bit less income in return for more free time because if you have a good hourly rate or wage there’s just no point in working beyond about 32 hours per week. The labour party here have suggested raising the top rate of tax to 60%; the labour minister of finance, who is luckily a bit less mad than his party members has said he won’t do that because it would damage the economy and wouldn’t raise any money.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                    The point at which most people think it is kleptocracy, is when their earning are taxed at 50%.
                    There is at the moment a curious psychological boundary at 50%, but there is nothing particularly special about that, once you have accepted the principle of income tax in the first place.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X