• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Wondered how long it would be...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Wondered how long it would be...

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8628323.stm


    I'm still can't work out if this is health-and-safety gone mad, a PR exercise ("safety comes first") gotten out of control (they thought it would be over in 12 hours) - or simply a real and tangible danger.

    The two airline bodies, ACI Europe and AEA, said: "The eruption of the Icelandic volcano is not an unprecedented event and the procedures applied in other parts of the world for volcanic eruptions do not appear to require the kind of restrictions that are presently being imposed in Europe."
    Germany's two biggest airlines, Lufthansa and Air Berlin, also said they had carried out test flights without apparent damage, as did Air France.

    Air Berlin spokeswoman Diana Daedelow told the BBC: "It is astonishing that these findings... have seemingly been ignored in the decision-making process of the aviation safety authorities."

    #2
    i would imagine you could find evidence to back up both sides

    I suppose the problem is is it a uniform density or are there larger conncentrations in certain areas which can cause issues

    in which case could we not do something with this data

    funny on tv this morning - Gordon B was on and someone asked about this and he did, fair play to him, give the guy a look which seemed to say "Oh ffs volcanos are my fault now are they?"

    Comment


      #3
      "It is astonishing that these findings... have seemingly been ignored in the decision-making process of the aviation safety authorities."

      How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

      Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
      Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

      "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

      Comment


        #4
        I would imagine most people wouldn't fancy being on a plane right now. I wish I had shares in the train companies.
        +50 Xeno Geek Points
        Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
        As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

        Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

        CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

        Comment


          #5
          Who is going to take the risk and go up first?...I mean nobody wants to be at 35,000 feet and have the engines go all quiet.

          <mod> Enough of that, thank you dspyssts </mod>
          Tyrell: "More human than human" is our motto.

          Comment


            #6
            No government is going to go against the advice of their experts and lift the ban. I don't think planes dropping out of the sky (even if its only one) is a vote-winner.
            +50 Xeno Geek Points
            Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
            As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

            Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

            CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

            Comment

            Working...
            X