S Korea and war with the North

[Troll]

Looks like the S Korean warship was blown up by a midget submarine or suicide frogmen

here

Given that this kind of action is usually classed as an "Act of War"

How would the panel respond if it were the S.Korean Govt and bear in mind N Korea has nukes

[minestrone]

Were the squad told that suicide is painless, it brings on many changes and they can take or leave it if they want?

[AtW]

How would the panel respond if it were the S.Korean Govt and bear in mind N Korea has nukes

Capture all transport carrying luxury goods cargo to the Supreme Leader who is said to enjoy fine cigars, caviar etc.

[DS23]

i'd ask for incontravertable proof from recognised experts in the field and then armed with that proof go to the united nations and table a motion for a motion to be placed onto the north korean leaders head.

[AtW]

Are they sufficiently weaponised to stick on a missile?

They've got enough arty pieces within range to bring South Korea to the level of North Korea...

[minestrone]

Are they sufficiently weaponised to stick on a missile?

They fired a missile over Japan last year, in theory they could get to the USA.

[Paddy]

Looks like the S Korean warship was blown up by a midget submarine or suicide frogmen

here

Given that this kind of action is usually classed as an "Act of War"

How would the panel respond if it were the S.Korean Govt and bear in mind N Korea has nukes

They are officially at war, the 1953 ceasefire is temporary.

[wobbegong]

i'd ask for incontravertable proof from recognised experts in the field and then armed with that proof go to the united nations and table a motion for a motion to be placed onto the north korean leaders head.

Hmmm, the U.N. aren't exactly known for springing into decisive action, are they?